Theorem tz9.1 8768

Description: Every set has a transitive closure (the smallest transitive extension). Theorem 9.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 73. See trcl 8767 for an explicit expression for the transitive closure. Apparently open problems are whether this theorem can be proved without the Axiom of Infinity; if not, then whether it implies Infinity; and if not, what is the "property" that Infinity has that the other axioms don't have that is weaker than Infinity itself?

(Added 22-Mar-2011) The following article seems to answer the first question, that it can't be proved without Infinity, in the affirmative: Mancini, Antonella and Zambella, Domenico (2001). "A note on recursive models of set theories." Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 42(2):109-115. (Thanks to Scott Fenton.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tz9.1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tz9.1	⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem tz9.1

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tz9.1.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		eqid 2770	. . 3 ⊢ (rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω) = (rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)
3		eqid 2770	. . 3 ⊢ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧)
4	1, 2, 3	trcl 8767	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦))
5		omex 8703	. . . 4 ⊢ ω ∈ V
6		fvex 6342	. . . 4 ⊢ ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∈ V
7	5, 6	iunex 7293	. . 3 ⊢ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∈ V
8		sseq2 3774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧)))
9		treq 4890	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧)))
10		sseq1 3773	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ↔ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦))
11	10	imbi2d 329	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) ↔ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦)))
12	11	albidv 2000	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → (∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦)))
13	8, 9, 12	3anbi123d 1546	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦))))
14	7, 13	spcev 3449	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ Tr ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → ∪ 𝑧 ∈ ω ((rec((𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ ∪ 𝑤)), 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝑧) ⊆ 𝑦)) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))
15	4, 14	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦((𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 382   ∧ w3a 1070  ∀wal 1628   = wceq 1630  ∃wex 1851   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3349   ∪ cun 3719   ⊆ wss 3721  ∪ cuni 4572  ∪ ciun 4652   ↦ cmpt 4861  Tr wtr 4884   ↾ cres 5251  ‘cfv 6031  ωcom 7211  reccrdg 7657

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1869  ax-4 1884  ax-5 1990  ax-6 2056  ax-7 2092  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2173  ax-11 2189  ax-12 2202  ax-13 2407  ax-ext 2750  ax-rep 4902  ax-sep 4912  ax-nul 4920  ax-pow 4971  ax-pr 5034  ax-un 7095  ax-inf2 8701

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 827  df-3or 1071  df-3an 1072  df-tru 1633  df-ex 1852  df-nf 1857  df-sb 2049  df-eu 2621  df-mo 2622  df-clab 2757  df-cleq 2763  df-clel 2766  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3065  df-rex 3066  df-reu 3067  df-rab 3069  df-v 3351  df-sbc 3586  df-csb 3681  df-dif 3724  df-un 3726  df-in 3728  df-ss 3735  df-pss 3737  df-nul 4062  df-if 4224  df-pw 4297  df-sn 4315  df-pr 4317  df-tp 4319  df-op 4321  df-uni 4573  df-iun 4654  df-br 4785  df-opab 4845  df-mpt 4862  df-tr 4885  df-id 5157  df-eprel 5162  df-po 5170  df-so 5171  df-fr 5208  df-we 5210  df-xp 5255  df-rel 5256  df-cnv 5257  df-co 5258  df-dm 5259  df-rn 5260  df-res 5261  df-ima 5262  df-pred 5823  df-ord 5869  df-on 5870  df-lim 5871  df-suc 5872  df-iota 5994  df-fun 6033  df-fn 6034  df-f 6035  df-f1 6036  df-fo 6037  df-f1o 6038  df-fv 6039  df-om 7212  df-wrecs 7558  df-recs 7620  df-rdg 7658

This theorem is referenced by:  epfrs  8770