Theorem tgcolg 25669

Description: We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tgcolg.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgcolg	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgcolg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 479	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
2	1	olcd 407	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
3		tglngval.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
6		tglngval.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7	6	adantr 472	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
8		tgcolg.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9	8	adantr 472	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
10		tglngval.x	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
11	10	adantr 472	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
12	3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11	tgbtwntriv2 25602	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))
13	1	oveq2d 6830	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍𝐼𝑋) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
14	12, 13	eleqtrd 2841	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
15	14	3mix2d 1422	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	2, 15	2thd 255	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17		simpr 479	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
18	17	neneqd 2937	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌)
19		biorf 419	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
21		orcom 401	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
22	20, 21	syl6bb 276	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
23		tglngval.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
24	6	adantr 472	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
25	10	adantr 472	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
26		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
27	26	adantr 472	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
28	8	adantr 472	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
29	3, 23, 5, 24, 25, 27, 17, 28	tgellng 25668	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
30	22, 29	bitr3d 270	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
31	16, 30	pm2.61dane 3019	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∨ wo 382   ∧ wa 383   ∨ w3o 1071   = wceq 1632   ∈ wcel 2139   ≠ wne 2932  ‘cfv 6049  (class class class)co 6814  Basecbs 16079  distcds 16172  TarskiGcstrkg 25549  Itvcitv 25555  LineGclng 25556

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1988  ax-6 2054  ax-7 2090  ax-9 2148  ax-10 2168  ax-11 2183  ax-12 2196  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2740  ax-sep 4933  ax-nul 4941  ax-pr 5055

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3or 1073  df-3an 1074  df-tru 1635  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2047  df-eu 2611  df-mo 2612  df-clab 2747  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2756  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3056  df-rab 3059  df-v 3342  df-sbc 3577  df-dif 3718  df-un 3720  df-in 3722  df-ss 3729  df-nul 4059  df-if 4231  df-sn 4322  df-pr 4324  df-op 4328  df-uni 4589  df-br 4805  df-opab 4865  df-id 5174  df-xp 5272  df-rel 5273  df-cnv 5274  df-co 5275  df-dm 5276  df-iota 6012  df-fun 6051  df-fv 6057  df-ov 6817  df-oprab 6818  df-mpt2 6819  df-trkgc 25567  df-trkgcb 25569  df-trkg 25572

This theorem is referenced by:  btwncolg1  25670  btwncolg2  25671  btwncolg3  25672  colcom  25673  colrot1  25674  lnxfr  25681  lnext  25682  tgfscgr  25683  tglowdim2l  25765  outpasch  25867