MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  suppval Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem suppval 7465
Description: The value of the operation constructing the support of a function. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 6-Apr-2019.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
suppval ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝑋   𝑖,𝑍
Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑖)   𝑊(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem suppval
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-supp 7464 . . 3 supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}})
21a1i 11 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → supp = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}}))
3 dmeq 5479 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
43adantr 472 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → dom 𝑥 = dom 𝑋)
5 imaeq1 5619 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
65adantr 472 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) = (𝑋 “ {𝑖}))
7 sneq 4331 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝑍 → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
87adantl 473 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑧} = {𝑍})
96, 8neeq12d 2993 . . . 4 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → ((𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧} ↔ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}))
104, 9rabeqbidv 3335 . . 3 ((𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
1110adantl 473 . 2 (((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝑋𝑧 = 𝑍)) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑧}} = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
12 elex 3352 . . 3 (𝑋𝑉𝑋 ∈ V)
1312adantr 472 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → 𝑋 ∈ V)
14 elex 3352 . . 3 (𝑍𝑊𝑍 ∈ V)
1514adantl 473 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → 𝑍 ∈ V)
16 dmexg 7262 . . . 4 (𝑋𝑉 → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
1716adantr 472 . . 3 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → dom 𝑋 ∈ V)
18 rabexg 4963 . . 3 (dom 𝑋 ∈ V → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
1917, 18syl 17 . 2 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}} ∈ V)
202, 11, 13, 15, 19ovmpt2d 6953 1 ((𝑋𝑉𝑍𝑊) → (𝑋 supp 𝑍) = {𝑖 ∈ dom 𝑋 ∣ (𝑋 “ {𝑖}) ≠ {𝑍}})
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 383   = wceq 1632  wcel 2139  wne 2932  {crab 3054  Vcvv 3340  {csn 4321  dom cdm 5266  cima 5269  (class class class)co 6813  cmpt2 6815   supp csupp 7463
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1988  ax-6 2054  ax-7 2090  ax-8 2141  ax-9 2148  ax-10 2168  ax-11 2183  ax-12 2196  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2740  ax-sep 4933  ax-nul 4941  ax-pr 5055  ax-un 7114
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1074  df-tru 1635  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2047  df-eu 2611  df-mo 2612  df-clab 2747  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2756  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3055  df-rex 3056  df-rab 3059  df-v 3342  df-sbc 3577  df-dif 3718  df-un 3720  df-in 3722  df-ss 3729  df-nul 4059  df-if 4231  df-sn 4322  df-pr 4324  df-op 4328  df-uni 4589  df-br 4805  df-opab 4865  df-id 5174  df-xp 5272  df-rel 5273  df-cnv 5274  df-co 5275  df-dm 5276  df-rn 5277  df-res 5278  df-ima 5279  df-iota 6012  df-fun 6051  df-fv 6057  df-ov 6816  df-oprab 6817  df-mpt2 6818  df-supp 7464
This theorem is referenced by:  suppvalbr  7467  supp0  7468  suppval1  7469  suppssdm  7476  suppsnop  7477  ressuppss  7482  ressuppssdif  7484
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator