![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ssrexf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: restricted existential quantification follows from a subclass relationship. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 20-Apr-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
ssrexf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ssrexf | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssrexf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | ssrexf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfss 3743 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 |
4 | ssel 3744 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anim1d 590 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | eximd 2240 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
7 | df-rex 3066 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
8 | df-rex 3066 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3imtr4g 285 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 382 ∃wex 1851 ∈ wcel 2144 Ⅎwnfc 2899 ∃wrex 3061 ⊆ wss 3721 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1869 ax-4 1884 ax-5 1990 ax-6 2056 ax-7 2092 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2173 ax-11 2189 ax-12 2202 ax-13 2407 ax-ext 2750 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-an 383 df-or 827 df-tru 1633 df-ex 1852 df-nf 1857 df-sb 2049 df-clab 2757 df-cleq 2763 df-clel 2766 df-nfc 2901 df-ral 3065 df-rex 3066 df-in 3728 df-ss 3735 |
This theorem is referenced by: iunxdif3 4738 stoweidlem34 40762 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |