Theorem sb6 2428

Description: Equivalence for substitution. Compare Theorem 6.2 of [Quine] p. 40. Also proved as Lemmas 16 and 17 of [Tarski] p. 70. The implication "to the left" is sb2 2351 and does not require any dv condition. Theorem sb6f 2384 replaces the dv condition with a non-freeness hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Sep-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb6	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb6

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb1 1882	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
2		sb56 2149	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	sylib 208	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
4		sb2 2351	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5	3, 4	impbii 199	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384  ∀wal 1480  ∃wex 1703  [wsb 1879

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1721  ax-4 1736  ax-5 1838  ax-6 1887  ax-7 1934  ax-10 2018  ax-12 2046  ax-13 2245

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-ex 1704  df-nf 1709  df-sb 1880

This theorem is referenced by:  sb5  2429  2sb6  2443  sb6a  2447  2eu6  2557