Theorem sb5ALTVD 39683

Description: The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20 Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2276, found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sb5ALT 39269 is sb5ALTVD 39683 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 39683.

1::	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
2::	⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
3:1,2:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   )
5:4:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
6::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
7::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝜑   )
9:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
101::	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11:101,10:	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
12:5,11:	⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
qed:12:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb5ALTVD	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb5ALTVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 39328	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
2		equsb1 2518	. . . . . 6 ⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
3		sban 2549	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4	3	simplbi2com 491	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	1, 2, 4	e10 39457	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
6		spsbe 2056	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	e1a 39390	. . . 4 ⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
8	7	in1 39325	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
9		hbs1 2278	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
10		idn2 39376	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
11		simpr 472	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
12	10, 11	e2 39394	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝜑   )
13		simpl 469	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
14	10, 13	e2 39394	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
15		sbequ1 2269	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
16	15	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	12, 14, 16	e22 39434	. . . 4 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
18	9, 17	exinst 39387	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
19	8, 18	pm3.2i 457	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
20		impbi 199	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) → ((∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))))
21	20	imp 394	. 2 ⊢ ((([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
22	19, 21	e0a 39536	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 197   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1634  ∃wex 1855  [wsb 2052

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1873  ax-4 1888  ax-5 1994  ax-6 2060  ax-7 2096  ax-10 2177  ax-12 2206  ax-13 2411

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 384  df-or 864  df-ex 1856  df-nf 1861  df-sb 2053  df-vd1 39324  df-vd2 39332

This theorem is referenced by: (None)