Theorem rspcimdv 3438

Description: Restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcimdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcimdv	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcimdv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ral 3043	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
2		rspcimdv.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
3		simpr 479	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 = 𝐴)
4	3	eleq1d 2812	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	biimprd 238	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6		rspcimdv.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
7	5, 6	imim12d 81	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))
8	2, 7	spcimdv 3418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))
9	2, 8	mpid 44	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓) → 𝜒))
10	1, 9	syl5bi 232	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1618   = wceq 1620   ∈ wcel 2127  ∀wral 3038

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1859  ax-4 1874  ax-5 1976  ax-6 2042  ax-7 2078  ax-9 2136  ax-10 2156  ax-11 2171  ax-12 2184  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2728

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1623  df-ex 1842  df-nf 1847  df-sb 2035  df-clab 2735  df-cleq 2741  df-clel 2744  df-nfc 2879  df-ral 3043  df-v 3330

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcimedv  3439  rspcdv  3440  wrd2ind  13648  mreexd  16475  mreexexlemd  16477  catcocl  16518  catass  16519  moni  16568  subccocl  16677  funcco  16703  fullfo  16744  fthf1  16749  nati  16787  acsfiindd  17349  chpscmat  20820  friendshipgt3  27537  lmxrge0  30278  funressnfv  41683