![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rspcebdv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution in both directions. (Contributed by AV, 8-Jan-2022.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspcdv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
rspcdv.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
rspcebdv.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝐴) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspcebdv | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rspcebdv.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 = 𝐴) | |
2 | rspcdv.2 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | syldan 488 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
4 | 3 | biimpd 219 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
5 | 4 | expcom 450 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) |
6 | 5 | pm2.43b 55 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
7 | 6 | rexlimdvw 3170 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → 𝜒)) |
8 | rspcdv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | |
9 | 8, 2 | rspcedv 3451 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) |
10 | 7, 9 | impbid 202 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1630 ∈ wcel 2137 ∃wrex 3049 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1869 ax-4 1884 ax-5 1986 ax-6 2052 ax-7 2088 ax-9 2146 ax-10 2166 ax-11 2181 ax-12 2194 ax-13 2389 ax-ext 2738 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-tru 1633 df-ex 1852 df-nf 1857 df-sb 2045 df-clab 2745 df-cleq 2751 df-clel 2754 df-nfc 2889 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3054 df-v 3340 |
This theorem is referenced by: fusgr2wsp2nb 27486 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |