Theorem rp-fakeuninass 38360

Description: A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by Richard Penner, 29-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rp-fakeuninass	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))

Proof of Theorem rp-fakeuninass

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rp-fakeinunass 38359	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)))
2		eqcom 2763	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴))
3		incom 3944	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐶)
4		uncom 3896	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
5	4	ineq1i 3949	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∪ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)
6	3, 5	eqtri 2778	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)
7		uncom 3896	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))
8		incom 3944	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
9	8	uneq2i 3903	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
10	7, 9	eqtri 2778	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
11	6, 10	eqeq12i 2770	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐴)) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
12	1, 2, 11	3bitri 286	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 196   = wceq 1628   ∪ cun 3709   ∩ cin 3710   ⊆ wss 3711

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1867  ax-4 1882  ax-5 1984  ax-6 2050  ax-7 2086  ax-9 2144  ax-10 2164  ax-11 2179  ax-12 2192  ax-13 2387  ax-ext 2736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1631  df-ex 1850  df-nf 1855  df-sb 2043  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2749  df-clel 2752  df-nfc 2887  df-v 3338  df-un 3716  df-in 3718  df-ss 3725

This theorem is referenced by: (None)