Theorem rmorabex 5077

Description: Restricted "at most one" existence implies a restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmorabex	⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rmorabex

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		moabex 5076	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
2		df-rmo 3058	. 2 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		df-rab 3059	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
4	3	eleq1i 2830	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
5	1, 2, 4	3imtr4i 281	1 ⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   ∈ wcel 2139  ∃*wmo 2608  {cab 2746  ∃*wrmo 3053  {crab 3054  Vcvv 3340

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1988  ax-6 2054  ax-7 2090  ax-9 2148  ax-10 2168  ax-11 2183  ax-12 2196  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2740  ax-sep 4933  ax-nul 4941  ax-pr 5055

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1635  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2047  df-eu 2611  df-mo 2612  df-clab 2747  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2756  df-nfc 2891  df-rmo 3058  df-rab 3059  df-v 3342  df-dif 3718  df-un 3720  df-in 3722  df-ss 3729  df-nul 4059  df-sn 4322  df-pr 4324

This theorem is referenced by:  supexd  8524