![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > riotabidva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction rule). (rabbidva 3328 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2012.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
riotabidva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
riotabidva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | riotabidva.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | 1 | pm5.32da 676 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
3 | 2 | iotabidv 6033 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒))) |
4 | df-riota 6774 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
5 | df-riota 6774 | . 2 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) = (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 3, 4, 5 | 3eqtr4g 2819 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1632 ∈ wcel 2139 ℩cio 6010 ℩crio 6773 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1871 ax-4 1886 ax-5 1988 ax-6 2054 ax-7 2090 ax-9 2148 ax-10 2168 ax-11 2183 ax-12 2196 ax-13 2391 ax-ext 2740 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-tru 1635 df-ex 1854 df-nf 1859 df-sb 2047 df-clab 2747 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2756 df-nfc 2891 df-rex 3056 df-uni 4589 df-iota 6012 df-riota 6774 |
This theorem is referenced by: riotabiia 6791 dfceil2 12834 cidpropd 16571 grpinvpropd 17691 mirval 25749 mirfv 25750 grpoidval 27676 adjval2 29059 xdivval 29936 toslub 29977 tosglb 29979 ringinvval 30101 glbconN 35166 cdlemk33N 36699 cdlemk34 36700 cdlemkid4 36724 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |