![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > rabss2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabss2 | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pm3.45 915 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | 1 | alimi 1888 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
3 | dfss2 3732 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
4 | ss2ab 3811 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | 3imtr4i 281 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
6 | df-rab 3059 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | df-rab 3059 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3sstr4g 3787 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 383 ∀wal 1630 ∈ wcel 2139 {cab 2746 {crab 3054 ⊆ wss 3715 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1871 ax-4 1886 ax-5 1988 ax-6 2054 ax-7 2090 ax-9 2148 ax-10 2168 ax-11 2183 ax-12 2196 ax-13 2391 ax-ext 2740 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-tru 1635 df-ex 1854 df-nf 1859 df-sb 2047 df-clab 2747 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2756 df-nfc 2891 df-rab 3059 df-in 3722 df-ss 3729 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabssrabd 3830 sess2 5235 suppfnssOLD 7490 hashbcss 15930 dprdss 18648 minveclem4 23423 prmdvdsfi 25053 mumul 25127 sqff1o 25128 rpvmasumlem 25396 disjxwwlkn 27052 clwwlknfi 27195 shatomistici 29550 rabfodom 29672 xpinpreima2 30283 ballotth 30929 bj-unrab 33247 icorempt2 33528 lssats 34820 lpssat 34821 lssatle 34823 lssat 34824 atlatmstc 35127 dochspss 37187 rmxyelqirr 37995 idomodle 38294 sssmf 41471 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |