Theorem pliguhgr 27570

Description: Any planar incidence geometry 𝐺 can be regarded as a hypergraph with its points as vertices and its lines as edges. See incistruhgr 26094 for a generalization of this case for arbitrary incidence structures (planar incidence geometries are such incidence structures). (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 24-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pliguhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem pliguhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1oi 6287	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺
2		f1of 6250	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺 → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺)
3		pwuni 4582	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺
4		n0lplig 27567	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
5	4	adantr 472	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
6		disjsn 4353	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
7	5, 6	sylibr 224	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → (𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅)
8		reldisj 4128	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
9	8	adantl 473	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
10	7, 9	mpbid 222	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
11	3, 10	mpan2 709	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
12		fss 6169	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
13	11, 12	sylan2 492	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ Plig) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
14	13	ex 449	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 → (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
15	1, 2, 14	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
16	15	ffdmd 6176	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
17		uniexg 7072	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∪ 𝐺 ∈ V)
18		resiexg 7219	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V)
19		isuhgrop 26085	. . 3 ⊢ ((∪ 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
20	17, 18, 19	syl2anc 696	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
21	16, 20	mpbird 247	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1596   ∈ wcel 2103  Vcvv 3304   ∖ cdif 3677   ∩ cin 3679   ⊆ wss 3680  ∅c0 4023  𝒫 cpw 4266  {csn 4285  ⟨cop 4291  ∪ cuni 4544   I cid 5127  dom cdm 5218   ↾ cres 5220  ⟶wf 5997  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6000  UHGraphcuhgr 26071  Pligcplig 27558

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1835  ax-4 1850  ax-5 1952  ax-6 2018  ax-7 2054  ax-8 2105  ax-9 2112  ax-10 2132  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2160  ax-13 2355  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 4889  ax-nul 4897  ax-pow 4948  ax-pr 5011  ax-un 7066  ax-reg 8613

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1074  df-tru 1599  df-ex 1818  df-nf 1823  df-sb 2011  df-eu 2575  df-mo 2576  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2720  df-nfc 2855  df-ne 2897  df-ral 3019  df-rex 3020  df-reu 3021  df-rab 3023  df-v 3306  df-sbc 3542  df-dif 3683  df-un 3685  df-in 3687  df-ss 3694  df-nul 4024  df-if 4195  df-pw 4268  df-sn 4286  df-pr 4288  df-op 4292  df-uni 4545  df-br 4761  df-opab 4821  df-mpt 4838  df-id 5128  df-xp 5224  df-rel 5225  df-cnv 5226  df-co 5227  df-dm 5228  df-rn 5229  df-res 5230  df-ima 5231  df-iota 5964  df-fun 6003  df-fn 6004  df-f 6005  df-f1 6006  df-fo 6007  df-f1o 6008  df-fv 6009  df-1st 7285  df-2nd 7286  df-vtx 25996  df-iedg 25997  df-uhgr 26073  df-plig 27559

This theorem is referenced by: (None)