Theorem opthregOLD 8678

Description: Obsolete proof of opthreg 8676 as of 15-Jun-2022. Theorem for alternate representation of ordered pairs, requiring the Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 8652 (via the preleqOLD 8677 step). See df-op 4321 for a description of other ordered pair representations. Exercise 34 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1996.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opthreg.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
opthreg.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
opthreg.3	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
opthreg.4	⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opthregOLD	⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))

Proof of Theorem opthregOLD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opthreg.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	prid1 4431	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}
3		opthreg.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V
4	3	prid1 4431	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷}
5		prex 5037	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ V
6		prex 5037	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝐶, 𝐷} ∈ V
7	1, 5, 3, 6	preleqOLD 8677	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷}) ∧ {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}))
8	2, 4, 7	mpanl12 674	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}))
9		preq1 4402	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐵})
10	9	eqeq1d 2772	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ {𝐶, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}))
11		opthreg.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
12		opthreg.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V
13	11, 12	preqr2 4510	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝐶, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} → 𝐵 = 𝐷)
14	10, 13	syl6bi 243	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷} → 𝐵 = 𝐷))
15	14	imdistani 550	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷}) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
16	8, 15	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
17		preq1 4402	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐴, 𝐵}})
18	17	adantr 466	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐴, 𝐵}})
19		preq12 4404	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷})
20	19	preq2d 4409	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐶, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}})
21	18, 20	eqtrd 2804	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}})
22	16, 21	impbii 199	1 ⊢ ({𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}} = {𝐶, {𝐶, 𝐷}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 382   = wceq 1630   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3349  {cpr 4316

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1869  ax-4 1884  ax-5 1990  ax-6 2056  ax-7 2092  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2173  ax-11 2189  ax-12 2202  ax-13 2407  ax-ext 2750  ax-sep 4912  ax-nul 4920  ax-pr 5034  ax-reg 8652

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 827  df-3an 1072  df-tru 1633  df-ex 1852  df-nf 1857  df-sb 2049  df-eu 2621  df-mo 2622  df-clab 2757  df-cleq 2763  df-clel 2766  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3065  df-rex 3066  df-rab 3069  df-v 3351  df-sbc 3586  df-dif 3724  df-un 3726  df-in 3728  df-ss 3735  df-nul 4062  df-if 4224  df-sn 4315  df-pr 4317  df-op 4321  df-br 4785  df-opab 4845  df-eprel 5162  df-fr 5208

This theorem is referenced by: (None)