Theorem opabbid 4847

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
opabbid.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
opabbid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	anbi2d 606	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
5	2, 4	exbid 2246	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
6	1, 5	exbid 2246	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
7	6	abbidv 2889	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)})
8		df-opab 4845	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
9		df-opab 4845	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2829	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 382   = wceq 1630  ∃wex 1851  Ⅎwnf 1855  {cab 2756  ⟨cop 4320  {copab 4844

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1869  ax-4 1884  ax-5 1990  ax-6 2056  ax-7 2092  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2173  ax-11 2189  ax-12 2202  ax-ext 2750

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 827  df-tru 1633  df-ex 1852  df-nf 1857  df-sb 2049  df-clab 2757  df-cleq 2763  df-clel 2766  df-opab 4845

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  4848  mpteq12f  4863  mpteq12d  4866  mpteq12df  4867  feqmptdf  6393  fnoprabg  6907  sprsymrelfo  42265