Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nss Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem nss 3696
 Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nss 𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem nss
StepHypRef Expression
1 exanali 1826 . . 3 (∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
2 dfss2 3624 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
31, 2xchbinxr 324 . 2 (∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝐵)
43bicomi 214 1 𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1521  ∃wex 1744   ∈ wcel 2030   ⊆ wss 3607 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-11 2074  ax-12 2087  ax-13 2282  ax-ext 2631 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-in 3614  df-ss 3621 This theorem is referenced by:  grur1  9680  psslinpr  9891  reclem2pr  9908  mreexexlem2d  16352  prmcyg  18341  filconn  21734  alexsubALTlem4  21901  wilthlem2  24840  shne0i  28435  erdszelem10  31308  fundmpss  31790  relintabex  38204  ntrneineine1lem  38699  nssrex  39574  nssd  39602  nsssmfmbf  41308
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator