![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 88 of 429) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-27903) |
![]() (27904-29428) |
![]() (29429-42879) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | rankidb 8701 | Identity law for the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc (rank‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | rankdmr1 8702 | A rank is a member of the cumulative hierarchy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅1 | ||
Theorem | rankr1ag 8703 | A version of rankr1a 8737 that is suitable without assuming Regularity or Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankr1bg 8704 | A relationship between rank and 𝑅1. See rankr1ag 8703 for the membership version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1rankidb 8705 | Any set is a subset of the hierarchy of its rank. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘(rank‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | r1elssi 8706 | The range of the 𝑅1 function is transitive. Lemma 2.10 of [Kunen] p. 97. One direction of r1elss 8707 that doesn't need 𝐴 to be a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | r1elss 8707 | The range of the 𝑅1 function is transitive. Lemma 2.10 of [Kunen] p. 97. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | pwwf 8708 | A power set is well-founded iff the base set is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | sswf 8709 | A subset of a well-founded set is well-founded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | snwf 8710 | A singleton is well-founded if its element is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → {𝐴} ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | unwf 8711 | A binary union is well-founded iff its elements are. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | prwf 8712 | An unordered pair is well-founded if its elements are. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | opwf 8713 | An ordered pair is well-founded if its elements are. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | unir1 8714 | The cumulative hierarchy of sets covers the universe. Proposition 4.45 (b) to (a) of [Mendelson] p. 281. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) = V | ||
Theorem | jech9.3 8715 | Every set belongs to some value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1, i.e. the indexed union of all values of 𝑅1 is the universe. Lemma 9.3 of [Jech] p. 71. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ On (𝑅1‘𝑥) = V | ||
Theorem | rankwflem 8716* | Every set is well-founded, assuming the Axiom of Regularity. Proposition 9.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 78. This variant of tz9.13g 8693 is useful in proofs of theorems about the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | rankval 8717* | Value of the rank function. Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 (proved as a theorem from our definition). (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | rankvalg 8718* | Value of the rank function. Definition 9.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 (proved as a theorem from our definition). This variant of rankval 8717 expresses the class existence requirement as an antecedent instead of a hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑥)}) | ||
Theorem | rankval2 8719* | Value of an alternate definition of the rank function. Definition of [BellMachover] p. 478. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝑥)}) | ||
Theorem | uniwf 8720 | A union is well-founded iff the base set is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | rankr1clem 8721 | Lemma for rankr1c 8722. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝑅1) → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (rank‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | rankr1c 8722 | A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | rankidn 8723 | A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘(rank‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | rankpwi 8724 | The rank of a power set. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankelb 8725 | The membership relation is inherited by the rank function. Proposition 9.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | wfelirr 8726 | A well-founded set is not a member of itself. This proof does not require the axiom of regularity, unlike elirr 8543. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankval3b 8727* | The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | ranksnb 8728 | The rank of a singleton. Theorem 15.17(v) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘{𝐴}) = suc (rank‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankonidlem 8729 | Lemma for rankonid 8730. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ (rank‘𝐴) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankonid 8730 | The rank of an ordinal number is itself. Proposition 9.18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onwf 8731 | The ordinals are all well-founded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ On ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) | ||
Theorem | onssr1 8732 | Initial segments of the ordinals are contained in initial segments of the cumulative hierarchy. (Contributed by FL, 20-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankr1g 8733 | A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | rankid 8734 | Identity law for the rank function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc (rank‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankr1 8735 | A relationship between the rank function and the cumulative hierarchy of sets function 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 = (rank‘𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | ssrankr1 8736 | A relationship between an ordinal number less than or equal to a rank, and the cumulative hierarchy of sets 𝑅1. Proposition 9.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐵 ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankr1a 8737 | A relationship between rank and 𝑅1, clearly equivalent to ssrankr1 8736 and friends through trichotomy, but in Raph's opinion considerably more intuitive. See rankr1b 8765 for the subset version. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1val2 8738* | The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed in terms of rank. Definition 15.19 of [Monk1] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ (rank‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴}) | ||
Theorem | r1val3 8739* | The value of the cumulative hierarchy of sets function expressed in terms of rank. Theorem 15.18 of [Monk1] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 {𝑦 ∣ (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | rankel 8740 | The membership relation is inherited by the rank function. Proposition 9.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankval3 8741* | The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑥} | ||
Theorem | bndrank 8742* | Any class whose elements have bounded rank is a set. Proposition 9.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥 → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | unbndrank 8743* | The elements of a proper class have unbounded rank. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ (rank‘𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | rankpw 8744 | The rank of a power set. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ranklim 8745 | The rank of a set belongs to a limit ordinal iff the rank of its power set does. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → ((rank‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝒫 𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1pw 8746 | A stronger property of 𝑅1 than rankpw 8744. The latter merely proves that 𝑅1 of the successor is a power set, but here we prove that if 𝐴 is in the cumulative hierarchy, then 𝒫 𝐴 is in the cumulative hierarchy of the successor. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | r1pwALT 8747 | Alternate shorter proof of r1pw 8746 based on the additional axioms ax-reg 8538 and ax-inf2 8576. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | r1pwcl 8748 | The cumulative hierarchy of a limit ordinal is closed under power set. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 29-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ (𝑅1‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankssb 8749 | The subset relation is inherited by the rank function. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankss 8750 | The subset relation is inherited by the rank function. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankunb 8751 | The rank of the union of two sets. Theorem 15.17(iii) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankprb 8752 | The rank of an unordered pair. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘{𝐴, 𝐵}) = suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankopb 8753 | The rank of an ordered pair. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → (rank‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankuni2b 8754* | The value of the rank function expressed recursively: the rank of a set is the smallest ordinal number containing the ranks of all members of the set. Proposition 9.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | ranksn 8755 | The rank of a singleton. Theorem 15.17(v) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘{𝐴}) = suc (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankuni2 8756* | The rank of a union. Part of Theorem 15.17(iv) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) | ||
Theorem | rankun 8757 | The rank of the union of two sets. Theorem 15.17(iii) of [Monk1] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankpr 8758 | The rank of an unordered pair. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘{𝐴, 𝐵}) = suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankop 8759 | The rank of an ordered pair. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = suc suc ((rank‘𝐴) ∪ (rank‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | r1rankid 8760 | Any set is a subset of the hierarchy of its rank. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘(rank‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | rankeq0b 8761 | A set is empty iff its rank is empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = ∅)) | ||
Theorem | rankeq0 8762 | A set is empty iff its rank is empty. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | rankr1id 8763 | The rank of the hierarchy of an ordinal number is itself. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅1 ↔ (rank‘(𝑅1‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankuni 8764 | The rank of a union. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) = ∪ (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankr1b 8765 | A relationship between rank and 𝑅1. See rankr1a 8737 for the membership version. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝑅1‘𝐵) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ranksuc 8766 | The rank of a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘suc 𝐴) = suc (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankuniss 8767 | Upper bound of the rank of a union. Part of Exercise 30 of [Enderton] p. 207. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) ⊆ (rank‘𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rankval4 8768* | The rank of a set is the supremum of the successors of the ranks of its members. Exercise 9.1 of [Jech] p. 72. Also a special case of Theorem 7V(b) of [Enderton] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc (rank‘𝑥) | ||
Theorem | rankbnd 8769* | The rank of a set is bounded by a bound for the successor of its members. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rankbnd2 8770* | The rank of a set is bounded by the successor of a bound for its members. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (rank‘𝐴) ⊆ suc 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankc1 8771* | A relationship that can be used for computation of rank. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ∈ (rank‘∪ 𝐴) ↔ (rank‘𝐴) = (rank‘∪ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankc2 8772* | A relationship that can be used for computation of rank. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) = (rank‘∪ 𝐴) → (rank‘𝐴) = suc (rank‘∪ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rankelun 8773 | Rank membership is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐶) ∧ (rank‘𝐵) ∈ (rank‘𝐷)) → (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∈ (rank‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | rankelpr 8774 | Rank membership is inherited by unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐶) ∧ (rank‘𝐵) ∈ (rank‘𝐷)) → (rank‘{𝐴, 𝐵}) ∈ (rank‘{𝐶, 𝐷})) | ||
Theorem | rankelop 8775 | Rank membership is inherited by ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘𝐴) ∈ (rank‘𝐶) ∧ (rank‘𝐵) ∈ (rank‘𝐷)) → (rank‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) ∈ (rank‘〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
Theorem | rankxpl 8776 | A lower bound on the rank of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ⊆ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxpu 8777 | An upper bound on the rank of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankfu 8778 | An upper bound on the rank of a function. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 5-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (rank‘𝐹) ⊆ suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankmapu 8779 | An upper bound on the rank of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 5-Aug-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rank‘(𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)) ⊆ suc suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rankxplim 8780 | The rank of a Cartesian product when the rank of the union of its arguments is a limit ordinal. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. See rankxpsuc 8783 for the successor case. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxplim2 8781 | If the rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal, so is the rank of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) → Lim (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxplim3 8782 | The rank of a Cartesian product is a limit ordinal iff its union is. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Lim (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) ↔ Lim ∪ (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rankxpsuc 8783 | The rank of a Cartesian product when the rank of the union of its arguments is a successor ordinal. Part of Exercise 4 of [Kunen] p. 107. See rankxplim 8780 for the limit ordinal case. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = suc 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (rank‘(𝐴 × 𝐵)) = suc suc (rank‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | tcwf 8784 | The transitive closure function is well-founded if its argument is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (TC‘𝐴) ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) | ||
Theorem | tcrank 8785 | This theorem expresses two different facts from the two subset implications in this equality. In the forward direction, it says that the transitive closure has members of every rank below 𝐴. Stated another way, to construct a set at a given rank, you have to climb the entire hierarchy of ordinals below (rank‘𝐴), constructing at least one set at each level in order to move up the ranks. In the reverse direction, it says that every member of (TC‘𝐴) has a rank below the rank of 𝐴, since intuitively it contains only the members of 𝐴 and the members of those and so on, but nothing "bigger" than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (rank‘𝐴) = (rank “ (TC‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | scottex 8786* | Scott's trick collects all sets that have a certain property and are of the smallest possible rank. This theorem shows that the resulting collection, expressed as in Equation 9.3 of [Jech] p. 72, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | scott0 8787* | Scott's trick collects all sets that have a certain property and are of the smallest possible rank. This theorem shows that the resulting collection, expressed as in Equation 9.3 of [Jech] p. 72, contains at least one representative with the property, if there is one. In other words, the collection is empty iff no set has the property (i.e. 𝐴 is empty). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = ∅) | ||
Theorem | scottexs 8788* | Theorem scheme version of scottex 8786. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | scott0s 8789* | Theorem scheme version of scott0 8787. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is not empty iff there is an 𝑥 such that 𝜑(𝑥) holds. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | cplem1 8790* | Lemma for the Collection Principle cp 8792. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (rank‘𝑦) ⊆ (rank‘𝑧)} & ⊢ 𝐷 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | cplem2 8791* | -Lemma for the Collection Principle cp 8792. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (𝐵 ∩ 𝑦) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | cp 8792* | Collection Principle. This remarkable theorem scheme is in effect a very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement. The proof makes use of Scott's trick scottex 8786 that collapses a proper class into a set of minimum rank. The wff 𝜑 can be thought of as 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦). Scheme "Collection Principle" of [Jech] p. 72. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bnd 8793* | A very strong generalization of the Axiom of Replacement (compare zfrep6 7176), derived from the Collection Principle cp 8792. Its strength lies in the rather profound fact that 𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦) does not have to be a "function-like" wff, as it does in the standard Axiom of Replacement. This theorem is sometimes called the Boundedness Axiom. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bnd2 8794* | A variant of the Boundedness Axiom bnd 8793 that picks a subset 𝑧 out of a possibly proper class 𝐵 in which a property is true. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | kardex 8795* | The collection of all sets equinumerous to a set 𝐴 and having the least possible rank is a set. This is the part of the justification of the definition of kard of [Enderton] p. 222. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | karden 8796* | If we allow the Axiom of Regularity, we can avoid the Axiom of Choice by defining the cardinal number of a set as the set of all sets equinumerous to it and having the least possible rank. This theorem proves the equinumerosity relationship for this definition (compare carden 9411). The hypotheses correspond to the definition of kard of [Enderton] p. 222 (which we don't define separately since currently we do not use it elsewhere). This theorem along with kardex 8795 justify the definition of kard. The restriction to the least rank prevents the proper class that would result from {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐴}. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ≈ 𝐴 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} & ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ≈ 𝐵 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | htalem 8797* | Lemma for defining an emulation of Hilbert's epsilon. Hilbert's epsilon is described at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epsilon-calculus/. This theorem is equivalent to Hilbert's "transfinite axiom," described on that page, with the additional 𝑅 We 𝐴 antecedent. The element 𝐵 is the epsilon that the theorem emulates. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | hta 8798* |
A ZFC emulation of Hilbert's transfinite axiom. The set 𝐵 has the
properties of Hilbert's epsilon, except that it also depends on a
well-ordering 𝑅. This theorem arose from
discussions with Raph
Levien on 5-Mar-2004 about translating the HOL proof language, which
uses Hilbert's epsilon. See
http://us.metamath.org/downloads/choice.txt
(copy of obsolete link
http://ghilbert.org/choice.txt) and
http://us.metamath.org/downloads/megillaward2005he.pdf.
Hilbert's epsilon is described at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epsilon-calculus/. This theorem differs from Hilbert's transfinite axiom described on that page in that it requires 𝑅 We 𝐴 as an antecedent. Class 𝐴 collects the sets of the least rank for which 𝜑(𝑥) is true. Class 𝐵, which emulates the epsilon, is the minimum element in a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴. If a well-ordering 𝑅 on 𝐴 can be expressed in a closed form, as might be the case if we are working with say natural numbers, we can eliminate the antecedent with modus ponens, giving us the exact equivalent of Hilbert's transfinite axiom. Otherwise, we replace 𝑅 with a dummy setvar variable, say 𝑤, and attach 𝑤 We 𝐴 as an antecedent in each step of the ZFC version of the HOL proof until the epsilon is eliminated. At that point, 𝐵 (which will have 𝑤 as a free variable) will no longer be present, and we can eliminate 𝑤 We 𝐴 by applying exlimiv 1898 and weth 9355, using scottexs 8788 to establish the existence of 𝐴. For a version of this theorem scheme using class (meta)variables instead of wff (meta)variables, see htalem 8797. (Contributed by NM, 11-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} & ⊢ 𝐵 = (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑤𝑅𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → (𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Syntax | ccrd 8799 | Extend class definition to include the cardinal size function. |
class card | ||
Syntax | cale 8800 | Extend class definition to include the aleph function. |
class ℵ |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |