![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 385 of 429) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-27903) |
![]() (27904-29428) |
![]() (29429-42879) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Axiom | ax-frege1 38401 | The case in which 𝜑 is denied, 𝜓 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed is excluded. This is evident since 𝜑 cannot at the same time be denied and affirmed. Axiom 1 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-1 6. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜑)) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege2 38402 | If a proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of two propositions 𝜓 and 𝜑 and one of those, 𝜓, is in turn a necessary consequence of the other, 𝜑, then the proposition 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the latter one, 𝜑, alone. Axiom 2 of [Frege1879] p. 26. Identical to ax-2 7. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | rp-simp2-frege 38403 | Simplification of triple conjunction. Compare with simp2 1082. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | rp-simp2 38404 | Simplification of triple conjunction. Identical to simp2 1082. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | rp-frege3g 38405 |
Add antecedent to ax-frege2 38402. More general statement than frege3 38406.
Like ax-frege2 38402, it is essentially a closed form of mpd 15,
however it
has an extra antecedent.
It would be more natural to prove from a1i 11 and ax-frege2 38402 in Metamath. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege3 38406 | Add antecedent to ax-frege2 38402. Special case of rp-frege3g 38405. Proposition 3 of [Frege1879] p. 29. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))) | ||
Theorem | rp-misc1-frege 38407 | Double-use of ax-frege2 38402. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | rp-frege24 38408 | Introducing an embedded antecedent. Alternate proof for frege24 38426. Closed form for a1d 25. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | rp-frege4g 38409 | Deduction related to distribution. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege4 38410 | Special case of closed form of a2d 29. Special case of rp-frege4g 38409. Proposition 4 of [Frege1879] p. 31. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓)))) | ||
Theorem | frege5 38411 | A closed form of syl 17. Identical to imim2 58. Theorem *2.05 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. Proposition 5 of [Frege1879] p. 32. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | rp-7frege 38412 | Distribute antecedent and add another. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜃 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | rp-4frege 38413 | Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | rp-6frege 38414 | Elimination of a nested antecedent of special form. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃)) → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | rp-8frege 38415 | Eliminate antecedent when it is implied by previous antecedent. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | rp-frege25 38416 | Closed form for a1dd 50. Alternate route to Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | frege6 38417 | A closed form of imim2d 57 which is a deduction adding nested antecedents. Proposition 6 of [Frege1879] p. 33. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | axfrege8 38418 |
Swap antecedents. Identical to pm2.04 90. This demonstrates that Axiom 8
of [Frege1879] p. 35 is redundant.
Proof follows closely proof of pm2.04 90 in http://us.metamath.org/mmsolitaire/pmproofs.txt, but in the style of Frege's 1879 work. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege7 38419 | A closed form of syl6 35. The first antecedent is used to replace the consequent of the second antecedent. Proposition 7 of [Frege1879] p. 34. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜓)))) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege8 38420 | Swap antecedents. If two conditions have a proposition as a consequence, their order is immaterial. Third axiom of Frege's 1879 work but identical to pm2.04 90 which can be proved from only ax-mp 5, ax-frege1 38401, and ax-frege2 38402. (Redundant) Axiom 8 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege26 38421 | Identical to idd 24. Proposition 26 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege27 38422 | We cannot (at the same time) affirm 𝜑 and deny 𝜑. Identical to id 22. Proposition 27 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege9 38423 | Closed form of syl 17 with swapped antecedents. This proposition differs from frege5 38411 only in an unessential way. Identical to imim1 83. Proposition 9 of [Frege1879] p. 35. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege12 38424 | A closed form of com23 86. Proposition 12 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege11 38425 | Elimination of a nested antecedent as a partial converse of ja 173. If the proposition that 𝜓 takes place or 𝜑 does not is a sufficient condition for 𝜒, then 𝜓 by itself is a sufficient condition for 𝜒. Identical to jarr 106. Proposition 11 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | frege24 38426 | Closed form for a1d 25. Deduction introducing an embedded antecedent. Identical to rp-frege24 38408 which was proved without relying on ax-frege8 38420. Proposition 24 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege16 38427 | A closed form of com34 91. Proposition 16 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))))) | ||
Theorem | frege25 38428 | Closed form for a1dd 50. Proposition 25 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | frege18 38429 | Closed form of a syllogism followed by a swap of antecedents. Proposition 18 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | frege22 38430 | A closed form of com45 97. Proposition 22 of [Frege1879] p. 41. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))) | ||
Theorem | frege10 38431 | Result commuting antecedents within an antecedent. Proposition 10 of [Frege1879] p. 36. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | frege17 38432 | A closed form of com3l 89. Proposition 17 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege13 38433 | A closed form of com3r 87. Proposition 13 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege14 38434 | Closed form of a deduction based on com3r 87. Proposition 14 of [Frege1879] p. 37. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))))) | ||
Theorem | frege19 38435 | A closed form of syl6 35. Proposition 19 of [Frege1879] p. 39. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege23 38436 | Syllogism followed by rotation of three antecedents. Proposition 23 of [Frege1879] p. 42. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜃))))) | ||
Theorem | frege15 38437 | A closed form of com4r 94. Proposition 15 of [Frege1879] p. 38. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))))) | ||
Theorem | frege21 38438 | Replace antecedent in antecedent. Proposition 21 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜃) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege20 38439 | A closed form of syl8 76. Proposition 20 of [Frege1879] p. 40. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → ((𝜃 → 𝜏) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))))) | ||
Theorem | axfrege28 38440 | Contraposition. Identical to con3 149. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege28 38441 | Contraposition. Identical to con3 149. Theorem *2.16 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103. Axiom 28 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege29 38442 | Closed form of con3d 148. Proposition 29 of [Frege1879] p. 43. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege30 38443 | Commuted, closed form of con3d 148. Proposition 30 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | axfrege31 38444 | Identical to notnotr 125. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege31 38445 | 𝜑 cannot be denied and (at the same time ) ¬ ¬ 𝜑 affirmed. Duplex negatio affirmat. The denial of the denial is affirmation. Identical to notnotr 125. Axiom 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege32 38446 | Deduce con1 143 from con3 149. Proposition 32 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | frege33 38447 | If 𝜑 or 𝜓 takes place, then 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place. Identical to con1 143. Proposition 33 of [Frege1879] p. 44. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege34 38448 | If as a conseqence of the occurence of the circumstance 𝜑, when the obstacle 𝜓 is removed, 𝜒 takes place, then from the circumstance that 𝜒 does not take place while 𝜑 occurs the occurence of the obstacle 𝜓 can be inferred. Closed form of con1d 139. Proposition 34 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜒 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege35 38449 | Commuted, closed form of con1d 139. Proposition 35 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (¬ 𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege36 38450 | The case in which 𝜓 is denied, ¬ 𝜑 is affirmed, and 𝜑 is affirmed does not occur. If 𝜑 occurs, then (at least) one of the two, 𝜑 or 𝜓, takes place (no matter what 𝜓 might be). Identical to pm2.24 121. Proposition 36 of [Frege1879] p. 45. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege37 38451 | If 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of the occurrence of 𝜓 or 𝜑, then 𝜒 is a necessary consequence of 𝜑 alone. Similar to a closed form of orcs 408. Proposition 37 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | frege38 38452 | Identical to pm2.21 120. Proposition 38 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege39 38453 | Syllogism between pm2.18 122 and pm2.24 121. Proposition 39 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege40 38454 | Anything implies pm2.18 122. Proposition 40 of [Frege1879] p. 46. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | axfrege41 38455 | Identical to notnot 136. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege41 38456 | The affirmation of 𝜑 denies the denial of 𝜑. Identical to notnot 136. Axiom 41 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege42 38457 | Not not id 22. Proposition 42 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege43 38458 | If there is a choice only between 𝜑 and 𝜑, then 𝜑 takes place. Identical to pm2.18 122. Proposition 43 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege44 38459 | Similar to a commuted pm2.62 424. Proposition 44 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege45 38460 | Deduce pm2.6 182 from con1 143. Proposition 45 of [Frege1879] p. 47. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege46 38461 | If 𝜓 holds when 𝜑 occurs as well as when 𝜑 does not occur, then 𝜓 holds. If 𝜓 or 𝜑 occurs and if the occurences of 𝜑 has 𝜓 as a necessary consequence, then 𝜓 takes place. Identical to pm2.6 182. Proposition 46 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege47 38462 | Deduce consequence follows from either path implied by a disjunction. If 𝜑, as well as 𝜓 is sufficient condition for 𝜒 and 𝜓 or 𝜑 takes place, then the proposition 𝜒 holds. Proposition 47 of [Frege1879] p. 48. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege48 38463 | Closed form of syllogism with internal disjunction. If 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for the occurence of 𝜒 or 𝜓 and if 𝜒, as well as 𝜓, is a sufficient condition for 𝜃, then 𝜑 is a sufficient condition for 𝜃. See application in frege101 38575. Proposition 48 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege49 38464 | Closed form of deduction with disjunction. Proposition 49 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege50 38465 | Closed form of jaoi 393. Proposition 50 of [Frege1879] p. 49. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒) → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege51 38466 | Compare with jaod 394. Proposition 51 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜒) → (𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜃) → 𝜒)))) | ||
Here we leverage df-ifp 1033 to partition a wff into two that are disjoint with the selector wff. Thus if we are given ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) then we replace the concept (illegal in our notation ) (𝜑‘𝜓) with if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) to reason about the values of the "function." Likewise, we replace the similarly illegal concept ∀𝜓𝜑 with (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃). | ||
Theorem | axfrege52a 38467 | Justification for ax-frege52a 38468. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒))) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege52a 38468 | The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝜑 is affirmed ( in this specific case the identity logical funtion ) and the same proposition, this time where we substituted the content of 𝜓, is denied does not take place. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | frege52aid 38469 | The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which 𝜑 is affirmed and 𝜓 is denied does not take place. Identical to biimp 205. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege53aid 38470 | Specialization of frege53a 38471. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | frege53a 38471 | Lemma for frege55a 38479. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | axfrege54a 38472 | Justification for ax-frege54a 38473. Identical to biid 251. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege54a 38473 | Reflexive equality of wffs. The content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜑. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to biid 251. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege54cor0a 38474 | Synonym for logical equivalence. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege54cor1a 38475 | Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | frege55aid 38476 | Lemma for frege57aid 38483. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege55lem1a 38477 | Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜏 → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) → (𝜏 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))) | ||
Theorem | frege55lem2a 38478 | Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege55a 38479 | Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege55cor1a 38480 | Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege56aid 38481 | Lemma for frege57aid 38483. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | frege56a 38482 | Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | frege57aid 38483 | This is the all imporant formula which allows us to apply Frege-style definitions and explore their consequences. A closed form of biimpri 218. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege57a 38484 | Analogue of frege57aid 38483. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | axfrege58a 38485 | Identical to anifp 1040. Justification for ax-frege58a 38486. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege58a 38486 | If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2381. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | frege58acor 38487 | Lemma for frege59a 38488. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
Theorem | frege59a 38488 |
A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition
59 of [Frege1879] p. 51.
Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 38424 incorrectly referenced where frege30 38443 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → ¬ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | frege60a 38489 | Swap antecedents of ax-frege58a 38486. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜂) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁)))) | ||
Theorem | frege61a 38490 | Lemma for frege65a 38494. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | frege62a 38491 | A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2592 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))) | ||
Theorem | frege63a 38492 | Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (𝜂 → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))) | ||
Theorem | frege64a 38493 | Lemma for frege65a 38494. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜒, 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜃, 𝜁)))) | ||
Theorem | frege65a 38494 | A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2592 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁)))) | ||
Theorem | frege66a 38495 | Swap antecedents of frege65a 38494. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁)))) | ||
Theorem | frege67a 38496 | Lemma for frege68a 38497. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)))) | ||
Theorem | frege68a 38497 | Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | axfrege52c 38498 | Justification for ax-frege52c 38499. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Axiom | ax-frege52c 38499 | One side of dfsbcq 3470. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | frege52b 38500 | The case when the content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑦 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝑥 is affirmed and the same proposition, this time where we substitute the content of 𝑦, is denied does not take place. In [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑, 𝑥 can also occur in other than the argument (𝑧) places. Hence 𝑥 may still be contained in [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |