P. 30 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2901-3000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	3netr3g 2901	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr4g 2902	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	nebi 2903	Contraposition law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))
Theorem	pm13.18 2904	Theorem *13.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm13.181 2905	Theorem *13.181 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm2.61ine 2906	Inference eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	pm2.21ddne 2907	A contradiction implies anything. Equality/inequality deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61ne 2908	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61dne 2909	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61dane 2910	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61da2ne 2911	Deduction eliminating two inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61da3ne 2912	Deduction eliminating three inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐹) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61iine 2913	Equality version of pm2.61ii 177. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	neor 2914	Logical OR with an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	neanior 2915	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	ne3anior 2916	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))
Theorem	neorian 2917	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	nemtbir 2918	An inference from an inequality, related to modus tollens. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	nelne1 2919	Two classes are different if they don't contain the same element. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nelne2 2920	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelelne 2921	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 17-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-May-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	neneor 2922	If two classes are different, a third class must be different of at least one of them. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))
Theorem	nfne 2923	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	nfned 2924	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nabbi 2925	Not equivalent wff's correspond to not equal class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})
2.1.4.2  Negated membership
Syntax	wnel 2926	Extend wff notation to include negated membership.
wff 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Definition	df-nel 2927	Define negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	neli 2928	Inference associated with df-nel 2927. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nelir 2929	Inference associated with df-nel 2927. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Theorem	neleq12d 2930	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by FL, 10-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐷))
Theorem	neleq1 2931	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐶))
Theorem	neleq2 2932	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∉ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	nfnel 2933	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for negated membership. (Contributed by David Abernethy, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Theorem	nfneld 2934	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for negated membership. (Contributed by David Abernethy, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵)
Theorem	nnel 2935	Negation of negated membership, analogous to nne 2827. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elnelne1 2936	Two classes are different if they don't contain the same element. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	elnelne2 2937	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelcon3d 2938	Contrapositive law deduction for negated membership. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∉ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	elnelall 2939	A contradiction concerning membership implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.61danel 2940	Deduction eliminating an elementhood in an antecedent. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
2.1.5  Restricted quantification
Syntax	wral 2941	Extend wff notation to include restricted universal quantification.
wff ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Syntax	wrex 2942	Extend wff notation to include restricted existential quantification.
wff ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Syntax	wreu 2943	Extend wff notation to include restricted existential uniqueness.
wff ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Syntax	wrmo 2944	Extend wff notation to include restricted "at most one."
wff ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Syntax	crab 2945	Extend class notation to include the restricted class abstraction (class builder).
class {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
Definition	df-ral 2946	Define restricted universal quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Definition	df-rex 2947	Define restricted existential quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Definition	df-reu 2948	Define restricted existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Definition	df-rmo 2949	Define restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Definition	df-rab 2950	Define a restricted class abstraction (class builder), which is the class of all 𝑥 in 𝐴 such that 𝜑 is true. Definition of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
Theorem	rgen 2951	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	ralel 2952	All elements of a class are elements of the class. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	rgenw 2953	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	rgen2w 2954	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	mprg 2955	Modus ponens combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	mprgbir 2956	Modus ponens on biconditional combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	alral 2957	Universal quantification implies restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2006.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rsp 2958	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rspa 2959	Restricted specialization. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)
Theorem	rspec 2960	Specialization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	r19.21bi 2961	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)
Theorem	r19.21be 2962	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	rspec2 2963	Specialization rule for restricted quantification, with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)
Theorem	rspec3 2964	Specialization rule for restricted quantification, with three quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)
Theorem	rsp2 2965	Restricted specialization, with two quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1997.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r2allem 2966	Lemma factoring out common proof steps of r2alf 2967 and r2al 2968. Introduced to reduce dependencies on axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r2alf 2967*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Use r2allem 2966. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r2al 2968*	Double restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
Theorem	r3al 2969*	Triple restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑))
Theorem	nfra1 2970	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	hbra1 2971	The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	hbral 2972	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 13-Dec-2009.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	nfrald 2973	Deduction version of nfral 2974. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	nfral 2974	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	nfra2 2975*	Similar to Lemma 24 of [Monk2] p. 114, except the quantification of the antecedent is restricted. Derived automatically from hbra2VD 39410. Contributed by Alan Sare 31-Dec-2011. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	ral2imi 2976	Inference quantifying antecedent, nested antecedent, and consequent, with a strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2006.) Allow shortening of ralim 2977. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralim 2977	Distribution of restricted quantification over implication. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralimi2 2978	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimia 2979	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-1996.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimiaa 2980	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimi 2981	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	2ralimi 2982	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent two times, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	hbralrimi 2983	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). This theorem contains the common proof steps for ralrimi 2986 and ralrimiv 2994. Its main advantage over these two is its minimal references to axioms. The proof is extracted from NM's previous work. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	r19.21t 2984	Restricted quantifier version of 19.21t 2111; closed form of r19.21 2985. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)))
Theorem	r19.21 2985	Restricted quantifier version of 19.21 2113. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Mar-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralrimi 2986	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 (restricted quantifier version). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.) Shortened after introduction of hbralrimi 2983. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimdaa 2987	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimd 2988	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.21v 2989*	Restricted quantifier version of 19.21v 1908. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralimdv2 2990*	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdva 2991*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdv 2992*	Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1778). (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralimdvva 2993*	Deduction doubly quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1778). (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimiv 2994*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimiva 2995*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivw 2996*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimdv 2997*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimdva 2998*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralrimivv 2999*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralrimivva 3000*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version with double quantification.) (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)