P. 293 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29201-29300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ishst 29201*	Property of a complex Hilbert-space-valued state. Definition of CH-states in [Mayet3] p. 9. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ CHStates ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘(𝑆‘ ℋ)) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (((𝑆‘𝑥) ·ih (𝑆‘𝑦)) = 0 ∧ (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) +ℎ (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
Theorem	sticl 29202	[0, 1] closure of the value of a state. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ (0[,]1)))
Theorem	stcl 29203	Real closure of the value of a state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	hstcl 29204	Closure of the value of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ)
Theorem	hst1a 29205	Unit value of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ CHStates → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘ ℋ)) = 1)
Theorem	hstel2 29206	Properties of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵))) → (((𝑆‘𝐴) ·ih (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 0 ∧ (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((𝑆‘𝐴) +ℎ (𝑆‘𝐵))))
Theorem	hstorth 29207	Orthogonality property of a Hilbert-space-valued state. This is a key feature distinguishing it from a real-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵))) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ·ih (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 0)
Theorem	hstosum 29208	Orthogonal sum property of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵))) → (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((𝑆‘𝐴) +ℎ (𝑆‘𝐵)))
Theorem	hstoc 29209	Sum of a Hilbert-space-valued state of a lattice element and its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) +ℎ (𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴))) = (𝑆‘ ℋ))
Theorem	hstnmoc 29210	Sum of norms of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → (((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴))↑2) + ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴)))↑2)) = 1)
Theorem	stge0 29211	The value of a state is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0 ≤ (𝑆‘𝐴)))
Theorem	stle1 29212	The value of a state is less than or equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1))
Theorem	hstle1 29213	The norm of the value of a Hilbert-space-valued state is less than or equal to one. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) ≤ 1)
Theorem	hst1h 29214	The norm of a Hilbert-space-valued state equals one iff the state value equals the state value of the lattice unit. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = (𝑆‘ ℋ)))
Theorem	hst0h 29215	The norm of a Hilbert-space-valued state equals zero iff the state value equals zero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 0 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 0ℎ))
Theorem	hstpyth 29216	Pythagorean property of a Hilbert-space-valued state for orthogonal vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵))) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))↑2) = (((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴))↑2) + ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵))↑2)))
Theorem	hstle 29217	Ordering property of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)))
Theorem	hstles 29218	Ordering property of a Hilbert-space-valued state. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)) = 1))
Theorem	hstoh 29219	A Hilbert-space-valued state orthogonal to the state of the lattice unit is zero. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ CHStates ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) ·ih (𝑆‘ ℋ)) = 0) → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)
Theorem	hst0 29220	A Hilbert-space-valued state is zero at the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ CHStates → (𝑆‘0ℋ) = 0ℎ)
Theorem	sthil 29221	The value of a state at the full Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1)
Theorem	stj 29222	The value of a state on a join. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵))))
Theorem	sto1i 29223	The state of a subspace plus the state of its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴))) = 1)
Theorem	sto2i 29224	The state of the orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = (1 − (𝑆‘𝐴)))
Theorem	stge1i 29225	If a state is greater than or equal to 1, it is 1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (1 ≤ (𝑆‘𝐴) ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	stle0i 29226	If a state is less than or equal to 0, it is 0. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 0 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 0))
Theorem	stlei 29227	Ordering law for states. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ (𝑆‘𝐵)))
Theorem	stlesi 29228	Ordering law for states. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1)))
Theorem	stji1i 29229	Join of components of Sasaki arrow ->1. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) = ((𝑆‘(⊥‘𝐴)) + (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	stm1i 29230	State of component of unit meet. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	stm1ri 29231	State of component of unit meet. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1))
Theorem	stm1addi 29232	Sum of states whose meet is 1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2))
Theorem	staddi 29233	If the sum of 2 states is 2, then each state is 1. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	stm1add3i 29234	Sum of states whose meet is 1. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶)) = 1 → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) + (𝑆‘𝐶)) = 3))
Theorem	stadd3i 29235	If the sum of 3 states is 3, then each state is 1. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) + (𝑆‘𝐶)) = 3 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	st0 29236	The state of the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘0ℋ) = 0)
Theorem	strlem1 29237*	Lemma for strong state theorem: if closed subspace 𝐴 is not contained in 𝐵, there is a unit vector 𝑢 in their difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∃𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(normℎ‘𝑢) = 1)
Theorem	strlem2 29238*	Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐶) = ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐶)‘𝑢))↑2))
Theorem	strlem3a 29239*	Lemma for strong state theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → 𝑆 ∈ States)
Theorem	strlem3 29240*	Lemma for strong state theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. This lemma restates the hypotheses in a more convenient form to work with. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ States)
Theorem	strlem4 29241*	Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	strlem5 29242*	Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝐵) < 1)
Theorem	strlem6 29243*	Lemma for strong state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1))
Theorem	stri 29244*	Strong state theorem. The states on a Hilbert lattice define an ordering. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ States ((𝑓‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐵) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	strb 29245*	Strong state theorem (bidirectional version). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ States ((𝑓‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐵) = 1) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	hstrlem2 29246*	Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐶) = ((projℎ‘𝐶)‘𝑢))
Theorem	hstrlem3a 29247*	Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → 𝑆 ∈ CHStates)
Theorem	hstrlem3 29248*	Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem: the function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a state. This lemma restates the hypotheses in a more convenient form to work with. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ CHStates)
Theorem	hstrlem4 29249*	Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1)
Theorem	hstrlem5 29250*	Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)) < 1)
Theorem	hstrlem6 29251*	Lemma for strong set of CH states theorem. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ((normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝐵)) = 1))
Theorem	hstri 29252*	Hilbert space admits a strong set of Hilbert-space-valued states (CH-states). Theorem in [Mayet3] p. 10. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ CHStates ((normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐵)) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	hstrbi 29253*	Strong CH-state theorem (bidirectional version). Theorem in [Mayet3] p. 10 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ CHStates ((normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐴)) = 1 → (normℎ‘(𝑓‘𝐵)) = 1) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	largei 29254*	A Hilbert lattice admits a largei set of states. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ States (𝑓‘𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	jplem1 29255	Lemma for Jauch-Piron theorem. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐴)‘𝑢))↑2) = 1))
Theorem	jplem2 29256*	Lemma for Jauch-Piron theorem. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
Theorem	jpi 29257*	The function 𝑆, that maps a closed subspace to the square of the norm of its projection onto a unit vector, is a Jauch-Piron state. Remark in [Mayet] p. 370. (See strlem3a 29239 for the proof that 𝑆 is a state.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ↦ ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝑥)‘𝑢))↑2))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ ℋ ∧ (normℎ‘𝑢) = 1) → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 ∧ (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 1))
19.7.2  Godowski's equation
Theorem	golem1 29258	Lemma for Godowski's equation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ States → (((𝑓‘𝐹) + (𝑓‘𝐺)) + (𝑓‘𝐻)) = (((𝑓‘𝐷) + (𝑓‘𝑅)) + (𝑓‘𝑆)))
Theorem	golem2 29259	Lemma for Godowski's equation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ States → ((𝑓‘((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻)) = 1 → (𝑓‘𝐷) = 1))
Theorem	goeqi 29260	Godowski's equation, shown here as a variant equivalent to Equation SF of [Godowski] p. 730. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∩ 𝐺) ∩ 𝐻) ⊆ 𝐷
Theorem	stcltr1i 29261*	Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝐵) = 1) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	stcltr2i 29262*	Property of a strong classical state. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) = 1 → 𝐴 = ℋ))
Theorem	stcltrlem1 29263*	Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐵) = 1 → (𝑆‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) = 1))
Theorem	stcltrlem2 29264*	Lemma for strong classical state theorem. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑆‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑆‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	stcltrthi 29265*	Theorem for classically strong set of states. If there exists a "classically strong set of states" on lattice Cℋ (or actually any ortholattice, which would have an identical proof), then any two elements of the lattice commute, i.e., the lattice is distributive. (Proof due to Mladen Pavicic.) Theorem 3.3 of [MegPav2000] p. 2344. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∃𝑠 ∈ States ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑠‘𝑥) = 1 → (𝑠‘𝑦) = 1) → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
19.8  Cover relation, atoms, exchange axiom, and modular symmetry
19.8.1  Covers relation; modular pairs
Definition	df-cv 29266*	Define the covers relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68, whose notation we use. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See cvbr 29269 and cvbr2 29270 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ⋖ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊊ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ⊊ 𝑦)))}
Definition	df-md 29267*	Define the modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a modular pair." See mdbr 29281 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑀ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦))))}
Definition	df-dmd 29268*	Define the dual modular pair relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1, who use the notation (x,y)M* for "the ordered pair <x,y> is a dual modular pair." See dmdbr 29286 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑀ℋ* = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ Cℋ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 → ((𝑧 ∩ 𝑥) ∨ℋ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∩ (𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦))))}
Theorem	cvbr 29269*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvbr2 29270*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvcon3 29271	Contraposition law for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⋖ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cvpss 29272	The covers relation implies proper subset. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvnbtwn 29273	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn2 29274	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn3 29275	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊊ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐴)))
Theorem	cvnbtwn4 29276	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvnsym 29277	The covers relation is not symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvnref 29278	The covers relation is not reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cvntr 29279	The covers relation is not transitive. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	spansncv2 29280	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (¬ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))))
Theorem	mdbr 29281*	Binary relation expressing ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ is a modular pair. Definition 1.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdi 29282	Consequence of the modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdbr2 29283*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than mdbr 29281. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdbr3 29284*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdbr4 29285*	Binary relation expressing the modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdbr 29286*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	dmdmd 29287	The dual modular pair property expressed in terms of the modular pair property, that hold in Hilbert lattices. Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	mddmd 29288	The modular pair property expressed in terms of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdi 29289	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr2 29290*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version has a weaker constraint than dmdbr 29286. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdi2 29291	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr3 29292*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an equality instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdbr4 29293*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. This version quantifies an ordering instead of an inference. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdi4 29294	Consequence of the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr5 29295*	Binary relation expressing the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmd2 29296*	Relationship between modular pairs and dual-modular pairs. Lemma 1.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝑥))
Theorem	mdsl0 29297	A sublattice condition that transfers the modular pair property. Exercise 12 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. Also Lemma 1.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷))
Theorem	ssmd1 29298	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssmd2 29299	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssdmd1 29300	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)