P. 275 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

ex-natded5.8-2 27401

A more efficient proof of Theorem 5.8 of [Clemente] p. 20. For a longer line-by-line translation, see ex-natded5.8 27400. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ¬ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)

Theorem

ex-natded5.13 27402

Theorem 5.13 of [Clemente] p. 20, translated line by line using the interpretation of natural deduction in Metamath. For information about ND and Metamath, see the page on Deduction Form and Natural Deduction in Metamath Proof Explorer. A much more efficient proof, using more of Metamath and MPE's capabilities, is shown in ex-natded5.13-2 27403. The original proof, which uses Fitch style, was written as follows (the leading "..." shows an embedded ND hypothesis, beginning with the initial assumption of the ND hypothesis):

#	MPE#	ND Expression	MPE Translation	ND Rationale	MPE Rationale
1	15	(𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)	(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))	Given	$e.
2;3	2	(𝜓 → 𝜃)	(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))	Given	$e. adantr 480 to move it into the ND hypothesis
3	9	(¬ 𝜏 → ¬ 𝜒)	(𝜑 → (¬ 𝜏 → ¬ 𝜒))	Given	$e. ad2antrr 762 to move it into the ND sub-hypothesis
4	1	...| 𝜓	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜓)	ND hypothesis assumption	simpr 476
5	4	... 𝜃	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)	→E 2,4	mpd 15 1,3
6	5	... (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))	∨I 5	orcd 406 4
7	6	...| 𝜒	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜒)	ND hypothesis assumption	simpr 476
8	8	... ...| ¬ 𝜏	(((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ ¬ 𝜏) → ¬ 𝜏)	(sub) ND hypothesis assumption	simpr 476
9	11	... ... ¬ 𝜒	(((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ ¬ 𝜏) → ¬ 𝜒)	→E 3,8	mpd 15 8,10
10	7	... ... 𝜒	(((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ ¬ 𝜏) → 𝜒)	IT 7	adantr 480 6
11	12	... ¬ ¬ 𝜏	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ¬ ¬ 𝜏)	¬I 8,9,10	pm2.65da 599 7,11
12	13	... 𝜏	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)	¬E 11	notnotrd 128 12
13	14	... (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))	∨I 12	olcd 407 13
14	16	(𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)	(𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))	∨E 1,6,13	mpjaodan 844 5,14,15

The original used Latin letters; we have replaced them with Greek letters to follow Metamath naming conventions and so that it is easier to follow the Metamath translation. The Metamath line-for-line translation of this natural deduction approach precedes every line with an antecedent including 𝜑 and uses the Metamath equivalents of the natural deduction rules. To add an assumption, the antecedent is modified to include it (typically by using adantr 480; simpr 476 is useful when you want to depend directly on the new assumption). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜏 → ¬ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))

Theorem

ex-natded5.13-2 27403

A more efficient proof of Theorem 5.13 of [Clemente] p. 20. Compare with ex-natded5.13 27402. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜏 → ¬ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))

Theorem

ex-natded9.20 27404

Theorem 9.20 of [Clemente] p. 43, translated line by line using the usual translation of natural deduction (ND) in the Metamath Proof Explorer (MPE) notation. For information about ND and Metamath, see the page on Deduction Form and Natural Deduction in Metamath Proof Explorer. The original proof, which uses Fitch style, was written as follows (the leading "..." shows an embedded ND hypothesis, beginning with the initial assumption of the ND hypothesis):

#	MPE#	ND Expression	MPE Translation	ND Rationale	MPE Rationale
1	1	(𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))	(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))	Given	$e
2	2	𝜓	(𝜑 → 𝜓)	∧EL 1	simpld 474 1
3	11	(𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)	(𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))	∧ER 1	simprd 478 1
4	4	...| 𝜒	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜒)	ND hypothesis assumption	simpr 476
5	5	... (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))	∧I 2,4	jca 553 3,4
6	6	... ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))	∨IR 5	orcd 406 5
7	8	...| 𝜃	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜃)	ND hypothesis assumption	simpr 476
8	9	... (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))	∧I 2,7	jca 553 7,8
9	10	... ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))	((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))	∨IL 8	olcd 407 9
10	12	((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))	(𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))	∨E 3,6,9	mpjaodan 844 6,10,11

The original used Latin letters; we have replaced them with Greek letters to follow Metamath naming conventions and so that it is easier to follow the Metamath translation. The Metamath line-for-line translation of this natural deduction approach precedes every line with an antecedent including 𝜑 and uses the Metamath equivalents of the natural deduction rules. To add an assumption, the antecedent is modified to include it (typically by using adantr 480; simpr 476 is useful when you want to depend directly on the new assumption). Below is the final metamath proof (which reorders some steps).

A much more efficient proof is ex-natded9.20-2 27405. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 19-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))

Theorem

ex-natded9.20-2 27405

A more efficient proof of Theorem 9.20 of [Clemente] p. 45. Compare with ex-natded9.20 27404. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 19-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))

Theorem

ex-natded9.26 27406*

Theorem 9.26 of [Clemente] p. 45, translated line by line using an interpretation of natural deduction in Metamath. This proof has some additional complications due to the fact that Metamath's existential elimination rule does not change bound variables, so we need to verify that 𝑥 is bound in the conclusion. For information about ND and Metamath, see the page on Deduction Form and Natural Deduction in Metamath Proof Explorer. The original proof, which uses Fitch style, was written as follows (the leading "..." shows an embedded ND hypothesis, beginning with the initial assumption of the ND hypothesis):

#	MPE#	ND Expression	MPE Translation	ND Rationale	MPE Rationale
1	3	∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)	(𝜑 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)	Given	$e.
2	6	...| ∀𝑦𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)	((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑦𝜓)	ND hypothesis assumption	simpr 476. Later statements will have this scope.
3	7;5,4	... 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)	((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓) → 𝜓)	∀E 2,y	spsbcd 3482 (∀E), 5,6. To use it we need a1i 11 and vex 3234. This could be immediately done with 19.21bi 2097, but we want to show the general approach for substitution.
4	12;8,9,10,11	... ∃𝑥𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)	((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓) → ∃𝑥𝜓)	∃I 3,a	spesbcd 3555 (∃I), 11. To use it we need sylibr 224, which in turn requires sylib 208 and two uses of sbcid 3485. This could be more immediately done using 19.8a 2090, but we want to show the general approach for substitution.
5	13;1,2	∃𝑥𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)	(𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)	∃E 1,2,4,a	exlimdd 2126 (∃E), 1,2,3,12. We'll need supporting assertions that the variable is free (not bound), as provided in nfv 1883 and nfe1 2067 (MPE# 1,2)
6	14	∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)	(𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜓)	∀I 5	alrimiv 1895 (∀I), 13

The original used Latin letters for predicates; we have replaced them with Greek letters to follow Metamath naming conventions and so that it is easier to follow the Metamath translation. The Metamath line-for-line translation of this natural deduction approach precedes every line with an antecedent including 𝜑 and uses the Metamath equivalents of the natural deduction rules. Below is the final metamath proof (which reorders some steps).

Note that in the original proof, 𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦) has explicit parameters. In Metamath, these parameters are always implicit, and the parameters upon which a wff variable can depend are recorded in the "allowed substitution hints" below.

A much more efficient proof, using more of Metamath and MPE's capabilities, is shown in ex-natded9.26-2 27407.

(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 18-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜓)

Theorem

ex-natded9.26-2 27407*

A more efficient proof of Theorem 9.26 of [Clemente] p. 45. Compare with ex-natded9.26 27406. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑥𝜓)

17.1.4  Definitional examples

Theorem

ex-or 27408

Example for df-or 384. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)

⊢ (2 = 3 ∨ 4 = 4)

Theorem

ex-an 27409

Example for df-an 385. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.)

⊢ (2 = 2 ∧ 3 = 3)

Theorem

ex-dif 27410

Example for df-dif 3610. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ ({1, 3} ∖ {1, 8}) = {3}

Theorem

ex-un 27411

Example for df-un 3612. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ ({1, 3} ∪ {1, 8}) = {1, 3, 8}

Theorem

ex-in 27412

Example for df-in 3614. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ ({1, 3} ∩ {1, 8}) = {1}

Theorem

ex-uni 27413

Example for df-uni 4469. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2016.)

⊢ ∪ {{1, 3}, {1, 8}} = {1, 3, 8}

Theorem

ex-ss 27414

Example for df-ss 3621. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3}

Theorem

ex-pss 27415

Example for df-pss 3623. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ {1, 2} ⊊ {1, 2, 3}

Theorem

ex-pw 27416

Example for df-pw 4193. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2016.)

⊢ (𝐴 = {3, 5, 7} → 𝒫 𝐴 = (({∅} ∪ {{3}, {5}, {7}}) ∪ ({{3, 5}, {3, 7}, {5, 7}} ∪ {{3, 5, 7}})))

Theorem

ex-pr 27417

Example for df-pr 4213. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {1, -1} → (𝐴↑2) = 1)

Theorem

ex-br 27418

Example for df-br 4686. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → 3𝑅9)

Theorem

ex-opab 27419*

Example for df-opab 4746. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ (𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 1) = 𝑦)} → 3𝑅4)

Theorem

ex-eprel 27420

Example for df-eprel 5058. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ 5 E {1, 5}

Theorem

ex-id 27421

Example for df-id 5053. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ (5 I 5 ∧ ¬ 4 I 5)

Theorem

ex-po 27422

Example for df-po 5064. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ ( < Po ℝ ∧ ¬ ≤ Po ℝ)

Theorem

ex-xp 27423

Example for df-xp 5149. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ ({1, 5} × {2, 7}) = ({⟨1, 2⟩, ⟨1, 7⟩} ∪ {⟨5, 2⟩, ⟨5, 7⟩})

Theorem

ex-cnv 27424

Example for df-cnv 5151. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ ^◡{⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} = {⟨6, 2⟩, ⟨9, 3⟩}

Theorem

ex-co 27425

Example for df-co 5152. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ ((exp ∘ cos)‘0) = e

Theorem

ex-dm 27426

Example for df-dm 5153. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → dom 𝐹 = {2, 3})

Theorem

ex-rn 27427

Example for df-rn 5154. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → ran 𝐹 = {6, 9})

Theorem

ex-res 27428

Example for df-res 5155. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ ((𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} ∧ 𝐵 = {1, 2}) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = {⟨2, 6⟩})

Theorem

ex-ima 27429

Example for df-ima 5156. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ ((𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} ∧ 𝐵 = {1, 2}) → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = {6})

Theorem

ex-fv 27430

Example for df-fv 5934. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → (𝐹‘3) = 9)

Theorem

ex-1st 27431

Example for df-1st 7210. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ (1^st ‘⟨3, 4⟩) = 3

Theorem

ex-2nd 27432

Example for df-2nd 7211. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ (2^nd ‘⟨3, 4⟩) = 4

Theorem

1kp2ke3k 27433

Example for df-dec 11532, 1000 + 2000 = 3000.

This proof disproves (by counterexample) the assertion of Hao Wang, who stated, "There is a theorem in the primitive notation of set theory that corresponds to the arithmetic theorem 1000 + 2000 = 3000. The formula would be forbiddingly long... even if (one) knows the definitions and is asked to simplify the long formula according to them, chances are he will make errors and arrive at some incorrect result." (Hao Wang, "Theory and practice in mathematics" , In Thomas Tymoczko, editor, New Directions in the Philosophy of Mathematics, pp 129-152, Birkauser Boston, Inc., Boston, 1986. (QA8.6.N48). The quote itself is on page 140.)

This is noted in Metamath: A Computer Language for Pure Mathematics by Norman Megill (2007) section 1.1.3. Megill then states, "A number of writers have conveyed the impression that the kind of absolute rigor provided by Metamath is an impossible dream, suggesting that a complete, formal verification of a typical theorem would take millions of steps in untold volumes of books... These writers assume, however, that in order to achieve the kind of complete formal verification they desire one must break down a proof into individual primitive steps that make direct reference to the axioms. This is not necessary. There is no reason not to make use of previously proved theorems rather than proving them over and over... A hierarchy of theorems and definitions permits an exponential growth in the formula sizes and primitive proof steps to be described with only a linear growth in the number of symbols used. Of course, this is how ordinary informal mathematics is normally done anyway, but with Metamath it can be done with absolute rigor and precision."

The proof here starts with (2 + 1) = 3, commutes it, and repeatedly multiplies both sides by ten. This is certainly longer than traditional mathematical proofs, e.g., there are a number of steps explicitly shown here to show that we're allowed to do operations such as multiplication. However, while longer, the proof is clearly a manageable size - even though every step is rigorously derived all the way back to the primitive notions of set theory and logic. And while there's a risk of making errors, the many independent verifiers make it much less likely that an incorrect result will be accepted.

This proof heavily relies on the decimal constructor df-dec 11532 developed by Mario Carneiro in 2015. The underlying Metamath language has an intentionally very small set of primitives; it doesn't even have a built-in construct for numbers. Instead, the digits are defined using these primitives, and the decimal constructor is used to make it easy to express larger numbers as combinations of digits.

(Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 29-Jun-2016.) (Shortened by Mario Carneiro using the arithmetic algorithm in mmj2, 30-Jun-2016.)

⊢ (;;;1000 + ;;;2000) = ;;;3000

Theorem

ex-fl 27434

Example for df-fl 12633. Example by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.)

⊢ ((⌊‘(3 / 2)) = 1 ∧ (⌊‘-(3 / 2)) = -2)

Theorem

ex-ceil 27435

Example for df-ceil 12634. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ((⌈‘(3 / 2)) = 2 ∧ (⌈‘-(3 / 2)) = -1)

Theorem

ex-mod 27436

Example for df-mod 12709. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ((5 mod 3) = 2 ∧ (-7 mod 2) = 1)

Theorem

ex-exp 27437

Example for df-exp 12901. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ ((5↑2) = ;25 ∧ (-3↑-2) = (1 / 9))

Theorem

ex-fac 27438

Example for df-fac 13101. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (!‘5) = ;;120

Theorem

ex-bc 27439

Example for df-bc 13130. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (5C3) = ;10

Theorem

ex-hash 27440

Example for df-hash 13158. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (#‘{0, 1, 2}) = 3

Theorem

ex-sqrt 27441

Example for df-sqrt 14019. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (√‘;25) = 5

Theorem

ex-abs 27442

Example for df-abs 14020. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (abs‘-2) = 2

Theorem

ex-dvds 27443

Example for df-dvds 15028: 3 divides into 6. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 19-May-2015.)

⊢ 3 ∥ 6

Theorem

ex-gcd 27444

Example for df-gcd 15264. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (-6 gcd 9) = 3

Theorem

ex-lcm 27445

Example for df-lcm 15350. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (6 lcm 9) = ;18

Theorem

ex-prmo 27446

Example for df-prmo 15783: (#_p‘10) = 2 · 3 · 5 · 7. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2021.)

⊢ (#_p‘;10) = ;;210

17.1.5  Other examples

Theorem

aevdemo 27447*

Proof illustrating the comment of aev2 2028. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Mar-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑎∀𝑏 𝑐 = 𝑑 ∨ ∃𝑒 𝑓 = 𝑔) ∧ ∀ℎ(𝑖 = 𝑗 → 𝑘 = 𝑙)))

Theorem

ex-ind-dvds 27448

Example of a proof by induction (divisibility result). (Contributed by Stanislas Polu, 9-Mar-2020.) (Revised by BJ, 24-Mar-2020.)

⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ₀ → 3 ∥ ((4↑𝑁) + 2))

17.2  Humor

17.2.1  April Fool's theorem

Theorem

avril1 27449

Poisson d'Avril's Theorem. This theorem is noted for its Selbstdokumentieren property, which means, literally, "self-documenting" and recalls the principle of quidquid german dictum sit, altum viditur, often used in set theory. Starting with the seemingly simple yet profound fact that any object 𝑥 equals itself (proved by Tarski in 1965; see Lemma 6 of [Tarski] p. 68), we demonstrate that the power set of the real numbers, as a relation on the value of the imaginary unit, does not conjoin with an empty relation on the product of the additive and multiplicative identity elements, leading to this startling conclusion that has left even seasoned professional mathematicians scratching their heads. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

A reply to skeptics can be found at mmnotes.txt, under the 1-Apr-2006 entry.

⊢ ¬ (𝐴𝒫 ℝ(i‘1) ∧ 𝐹∅(0 · 1))

Theorem

2bornot2b 27450

The law of excluded middle. Act III, Theorem 1 of Shakespeare, Hamlet, Prince of Denmark (1602). Its author leaves its proof as an exercise for the reader - "To be, or not to be: that is the question" - starting a trend that has become standard in modern-day textbooks, serving to make the frustrated reader feel inferior, or in some cases to mask the fact that the author does not know its solution. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (2 · 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 2 · 𝐵)

Theorem

helloworld 27451

The classic "Hello world" benchmark has been translated into 314 computer programming languages - see http://www.roesler-ac.de/wolfram/hello.htm. However, for many years it eluded a proof that it is more than just a conjecture, even though a wily mathematician once claimed, "I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain." Using an IBM 709 mainframe, a team of mathematicians led by Prof. Loof Lirpa, at the New College of Tahiti, were finally able put it rest with a remarkably short proof only 4 lines long. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ¬ (ℎ ∈ (𝐿𝐿0) ∧ 𝑊∅(R1𝑑))

Theorem

1p1e2apr1 27452

One plus one equals two. Using proof-shortening techniques pioneered by Mr. Mel L. O'Cat, along with the latest supercomputer technology, Prof. Loof Lirpa and colleagues were able to shorten Whitehead and Russell's 360-page proof that 1+1=2 in Principia Mathematica to this remarkable proof only two steps long, thus establishing a new world's record for this famous theorem. (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (1 + 1) = 2

Theorem

eqid1 27453

Law of identity (reflexivity of class equality). Theorem 6.4 of [Quine] p. 41.

This law is thought to have originated with Aristotle (Metaphysics, Book VII, Part 17). It is one of the three axioms of Ayn Rand's philosophy (Atlas Shrugged, Part Three, Chapter VII). While some have proposed extending Rand's axiomatization to include Compassion and Kindness, others fear that such an extension may flirt with logical inconsistency. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 1-Apr-2009.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴

Theorem

1div0apr 27454

Division by zero is forbidden! If we try, we encounter the DO NOT ENTER sign, which in mathematics means it is foolhardy to venture any further, possibly putting the underlying fabric of reality at risk. Based on a dare by David A. Wheeler. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Apr-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (1 / 0) = ∅

Theorem

topnfbey 27455

Nothing seems to be impossible to Prof. Lirpa. After years of intensive research, he managed to find a proof that when given a chance to reach infinity, one could indeed go beyond, thus giving formal soundness to Buzz Lightyear's motto "To infinity... and beyond!" (Contributed by Prof. Loof Lirpa, 1-Apr-2020.) (Modified by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (0...+∞) → +∞ < 𝐵)

17.3  (Future - to be reviewed and classified)

17.3.1  Planar incidence geometry

Syntax

cplig 27456

Extend class notation with the class of all planar incidence geometries.

class Plig

Definition

df-plig 27457*

Define the class of planar incidence geometries. We use Hilbert's axioms and adapt them to planar geometry. We use ∈ for the incidence relation. We could have used a generic binary relation, but using ∈ allows us to reuse previous results. Much of what follows is directly borrowed from Aitken, Incidence-Betweenness Geometry, 2008, http://public.csusm.edu/aitken_html/m410/betweenness.08.pdf.

The class Plig is the class of planar incidence geometries, where a planar incidence geometry is defined as a set of lines satisfying three axioms. In the definition below, 𝑥 denotes a planar incidence geometry, so ∪ 𝑥 denotes the union of its lines, that is, the set of points in the plane, 𝑙 denotes a line, and 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐 denote points. Therefore, the axioms are: 1) for all pairs of (distinct) points, there exists a unique line containing them; 2) all lines contain at least two points; 3) there exist three non-collinear points. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.)

⊢ Plig = {𝑥 ∣ (∀𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝑥∀𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝑥(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙)) ∧ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝑥∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝑥(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ ∪ 𝑥∃𝑏 ∈ ∪ 𝑥∃𝑐 ∈ ∪ 𝑥∀𝑙 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑙))}

Theorem

isplig 27458*

The predicate "is a planar incidence geometry" for sets. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ Plig ↔ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙)) ∧ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑙))))

Theorem

ispligb 27459*

The predicate "is a planar incidence geometry". (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 → ∃!𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙)) ∧ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑙))))

Theorem

tncp 27460*

In any planar incidence geometry, there exist three non-collinear points. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑙))

Theorem

l2p 27461*

For any line in a planar incidence geometry, there exist two different points on the line. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐿))

Theorem

lpni 27462*

For any line in a planar incidence geometry, there exists a point not on the line. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Aug-2009.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝐺) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 𝑎 ∉ 𝐿)

Theorem

nsnlplig 27463

There is no "one-point line" in a planar incidence geometry. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ {𝐴} ∈ 𝐺)

Theorem

nsnlpligALT 27464

Alternate version of nsnlplig 27463 using the predicate ∉ instead of ¬ ∈ and whose proof is shorter. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → {𝐴} ∉ 𝐺)

Theorem

n0lplig 27465

There is no "empty line" in a planar incidence geometry. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)

⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)

Theorem

n0lpligALT 27466

Alternate version of n0lplig 27465 using the predicate ∉ instead of ¬ ∈ and whose proof bypasses nsnlplig 27463. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∅ ∉ 𝐺)

Theorem

eulplig 27467*

Through two distinct points of a planar incidence geometry, there is a unique line. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)

⊢ 𝑃 = ∪ 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)) → ∃!𝑙 ∈ 𝐺 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑙 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑙))

Theorem

pliguhgr 27468

Any planar incidence geometry 𝐺 can be regarded as a hypergraph with its points as vertices and its lines as edges. See incistruhgr 26019 for a generalization of this case for arbitrary incidence structures (planar incidence geometries are such incidence structures). (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 24-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

17.3.2  Aliases kept to prevent broken links

This section contains a few aliases that we temporarily keep to prevent broken links. If you land on any of these, please let the originating site and/or us know that the link that made you land here should be changed.

Theorem

dummylink 27469

Alias for a1ii 1 that may be referenced in some older works, and kept here to prevent broken links.

If you landed here, please let the originating site and/or us know that the link that made you land here should be changed to a link to a1ii 1.

(Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑

Theorem

id1 27470

Alias for idALT 23 that may be referenced in some older works, and kept here to prevent broken links.

If you landed here, please let the originating site and/or us know that the link that made you land here should be changed to a link to idALT 23.

(Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-1992.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜑)

PART 18  COMPLEX TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES (DEPRECATED)

The intent is for this deprecated section to be deleted once its theorems have extensible structure versions (or are not useful). You can make a list of "terminal" theorems (i.e., theorems not referenced by anything else) and for each theorem see if there exists an extensible structure version (or decide it is not useful), and if so, delete it. Then repeat this recursively. One way to search for terminal theorems is to log the output ("open log x.txt") of "show usage <label-match>" in metamath.exe and search for "(None)".

18.1  Additional material on group theory (deprecated)

This section contains an earlier development of groups that was defined before extensible structures were introduced.

The intent is for this deprecated section to be deleted once the corresponding definitions and theorems for complex topological vector spaces, which are using them, are revised accordingly.

18.1.1  Definitions and basic properties for groups

Syntax

cgr 27471

Extend class notation with the class of all group operations.

class GrpOp

Syntax

cgi 27472

Extend class notation with a function mapping a group operation to the group's identity element.

class GId

Syntax

cgn 27473

Extend class notation with a function mapping a group operation to the inverse function for the group.

class inv

Syntax

cgs 27474

Extend class notation with a function mapping a group operation to the division (or subtraction) operation for the group.

class /_𝑔

Definition

df-grpo 27475*

Define the class of all group operations. The base set for a group can be determined from its group operation. Based on the definition in Exercise 28 of [Herstein] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ GrpOp = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑡(𝑔:(𝑡 × 𝑡)⟶𝑡 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑡 ((𝑥𝑔𝑦)𝑔𝑧) = (𝑥𝑔(𝑦𝑔𝑧)) ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑡 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ((𝑢𝑔𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 (𝑦𝑔𝑥) = 𝑢))}

Definition

df-gid 27476*

Define a function that maps a group operation to the group's identity element. (Contributed by FL, 5-Feb-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ GId = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑢 ∈ ran 𝑔∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑔((𝑢𝑔𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥𝑔𝑢) = 𝑥)))

Definition

df-ginv 27477*

Define a function that maps a group operation to the group's inverse function. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ inv = (𝑔 ∈ GrpOp ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑔 ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ran 𝑔(𝑧𝑔𝑥) = (GId‘𝑔))))

Definition

df-gdiv 27478*

Define a function that maps a group operation to the group's division (or subtraction) operation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ /_𝑔 = (𝑔 ∈ GrpOp ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑔, 𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑔 ↦ (𝑥𝑔((inv‘𝑔)‘𝑦))))

Theorem

isgrpo 27479*

The predicate "is a group operation." Note that 𝑋 is the base set of the group. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ↔ (𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)) ∧ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑢))))

Theorem

isgrpoi 27480*

Properties that determine a group operation. Read 𝑁 as 𝑁(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑁𝐺𝑥) = 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ GrpOp

Theorem

grpofo 27481

A group operation maps onto the group's underlying set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → 𝐺:(𝑋 × 𝑋)–onto→𝑋)

Theorem

grpocl 27482

Closure law for a group operation. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)

Theorem

grpolidinv 27483*

A group has a left identity element, and every member has a left inverse. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑢))

Theorem

grpon0 27484

The base set of a group is not empty. (Contributed by Szymon Jaroszewicz, 3-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → 𝑋 ≠ ∅)

Theorem

grpoass 27485

A group operation is associative. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐺𝐶)))

Theorem

grpoidinvlem1 27486

Lemma for grpoidinv 27490. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑌𝐺𝐴) = 𝑈 ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝐴) = 𝐴)) → (𝑈𝐺𝐴) = 𝑈)

Theorem

grpoidinvlem2 27487

Lemma for grpoidinv 27490. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑈𝐺𝑌) = 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌𝐺𝐴) = 𝑈)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝑌)𝐺(𝐴𝐺𝑌)) = (𝐴𝐺𝑌))

Theorem

grpoidinvlem3 27488*

Lemma for grpoidinv 27490. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑈𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑧𝐺𝑥) = 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑦𝐺𝐴) = 𝑈 ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝑦) = 𝑈))

Theorem

grpoidinvlem4 27489*

Lemma for grpoidinv 27490. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑦𝐺𝐴) = 𝑈 ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝑦) = 𝑈)) → (𝐴𝐺𝑈) = (𝑈𝐺𝐴))

Theorem

grpoidinv 27490*

A group has a left and right identity element, and every member has a left and right inverse. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥𝐺𝑢) = 𝑥) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑦𝐺𝑥) = 𝑢 ∧ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = 𝑢)))

Theorem

grpoideu 27491*

The left identity element of a group is unique. Lemma 2.2.1(a) of [Herstein] p. 55. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → ∃!𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥)

Theorem

grporndm 27492

A group's range in terms of its domain. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → ran 𝐺 = dom dom 𝐺)

Theorem

0ngrp 27493

The empty set is not a group. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ GrpOp

Theorem

gidval 27494*

The value of the identity element of a group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (GId‘𝐺) = (℩𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥𝐺𝑢) = 𝑥)))

Theorem

grpoidval 27495*

Lemma for grpoidcl 27496 and others. (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → 𝑈 = (℩𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 (𝑢𝐺𝑥) = 𝑥))

Theorem

grpoidcl 27496

The identity element of a group belongs to the group. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ GrpOp → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋)

Theorem

grpoidinv2 27497*

A group's properties using the explicit identity element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → (((𝑈𝐺𝐴) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝑈) = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑦𝐺𝐴) = 𝑈 ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝑦) = 𝑈)))

Theorem

grpolid 27498

The identity element of a group is a left identity. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑈𝐺𝐴) = 𝐴)

Theorem

grporid 27499

The identity element of a group is a right identity. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (GId‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝑈) = 𝐴)

Theorem

grporcan 27500

Right cancellation law for groups. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ GrpOp ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐶) = (𝐵𝐺𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))