P. 236 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 23501-23600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	i1f1lem 23501*	Lemma for i1f1 23502 and itg11 23503. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:ℝ⟶{0, 1} ∧ (𝐴 ∈ dom vol → (◡𝐹 “ {1}) = 𝐴))
Theorem	i1f1 23502*	Base case simple functions are indicator functions of measurable sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom vol ∧ (vol‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	itg11 23503*	The integral of an indicator function is the volume of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1, 0))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom vol ∧ (vol‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ) → (∫1‘𝐹) = (vol‘𝐴))
Theorem	itg1addlem1 23504*	Decompose a preimage, which is always a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑘}))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ dom vol)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → (vol‘𝐵) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol‘∪ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (vol‘𝐵))
Theorem	i1faddlem 23505*	Decompose the preimage of a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (◡(𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺) “ {𝐴}) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐺((◡𝐹 “ {(𝐴 − 𝑦)}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑦})))
Theorem	i1fmullem 23506*	Decompose the preimage of a product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})) → (◡(𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺) “ {𝐴}) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (ran 𝐺 ∖ {0})((◡𝐹 “ {(𝐴 / 𝑦)}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑦})))
Theorem	i1fadd 23507	The sum of two simple functions is a simple function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺) ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	i1fmul 23508	The pointwise product of two simple functions is a simple function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺) ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	itg1addlem2 23509*	Lemma for itg1add 23513. The function 𝐼 represents the pieces into which we will break up the domain of the sum. Since it is infinite only when both 𝑖 and 𝑗 are zero, we arbitrarily define it to be zero there to simplify the sums that are manipulated in itg1addlem4 23511 and itg1addlem5 23512. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑖 ∈ ℝ, 𝑗 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑖 = 0 ∧ 𝑗 = 0), 0, (vol‘((◡𝐹 “ {𝑖}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑗})))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼:(ℝ × ℝ)⟶ℝ)
Theorem	itg1addlem3 23510*	Lemma for itg1add 23513. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑖 ∈ ℝ, 𝑗 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑖 = 0 ∧ 𝑗 = 0), 0, (vol‘((◡𝐹 “ {𝑖}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑗})))))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = 0 ∧ 𝐵 = 0)) → (𝐴𝐼𝐵) = (vol‘((◡𝐹 “ {𝐴}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝐵}))))
Theorem	itg1addlem4 23511*	Lemma for itg1add . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑖 ∈ ℝ, 𝑗 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑖 = 0 ∧ 𝑗 = 0), 0, (vol‘((◡𝐹 “ {𝑖}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑗})))))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ( + ↾ (ran 𝐹 × ran 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘(𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺)) = Σ𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹Σ𝑧 ∈ ran 𝐺((𝑦 + 𝑧) · (𝑦𝐼𝑧)))
Theorem	itg1addlem5 23512*	Lemma for itg1add . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑖 ∈ ℝ, 𝑗 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑖 = 0 ∧ 𝑗 = 0), 0, (vol‘((◡𝐹 “ {𝑖}) ∩ (◡𝐺 “ {𝑗})))))    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = ( + ↾ (ran 𝐹 × ran 𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘(𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺)) = ((∫1‘𝐹) + (∫1‘𝐺)))
Theorem	itg1add 23513	The integral of a sum of simple functions is the sum of the integrals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘(𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺)) = ((∫1‘𝐹) + (∫1‘𝐺)))
Theorem	i1fmulclem 23514	Decompose the preimage of a constant times a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (◡((ℝ × {𝐴}) ∘𝑓 · 𝐹) “ {𝐵}) = (◡𝐹 “ {(𝐵 / 𝐴)}))
Theorem	i1fmulc 23515	A nonnegative constant times a simple function gives another simple function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((ℝ × {𝐴}) ∘𝑓 · 𝐹) ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	itg1mulc 23516	The integral of a constant times a simple function is the constant times the original integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘((ℝ × {𝐴}) ∘𝑓 · 𝐹)) = (𝐴 · (∫1‘𝐹)))
Theorem	i1fres 23517*	The "restriction" of a simple function to a measurable subset is simple. (It's not actually a restriction because it is zero instead of undefined outside 𝐴.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑥), 0))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom vol) → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	i1fpos 23518*	The positive part of a simple function is simple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑥), (𝐹‘𝑥), 0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	i1fposd 23519*	Deduction form of i1fposd 23519. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ 𝐴) ∈ dom ∫1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(0 ≤ 𝐴, 𝐴, 0)) ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	i1fsub 23520	The difference of two simple functions is a simple function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 − 𝐺) ∈ dom ∫1)
Theorem	itg1sub 23521	The integral of a difference of two simple functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1) → (∫1‘(𝐹 ∘𝑓 − 𝐺)) = ((∫1‘𝐹) − (∫1‘𝐺)))
Theorem	itg10a 23522*	The integral of a simple function supported on a nullset is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘𝐴) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘𝐹) = 0)
Theorem	itg1ge0a 23523*	The integral of an almost positive simple function is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘𝐴) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ 𝐴)) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (∫1‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg1lea 23524*	Approximate version of itg1le 23525. If 𝐹 ≤ 𝐺 for almost all 𝑥, then ∫1𝐹 ≤ ∫1𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘𝐴) = 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘𝐹) ≤ (∫1‘𝐺))
Theorem	itg1le 23525	If one simple function dominates another, then the integral of the larger is also larger. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐹 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐺) → (∫1‘𝐹) ≤ (∫1‘𝐺))
Theorem	itg1climres 23526*	Restricting the simple function 𝐹 to the increasing sequence 𝐴(𝑛) of measurable sets whose union is ℝ yields a sequence of simple functions whose integrals approach the integral of 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ⟶dom vol)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴‘𝑛) ⊆ (𝐴‘(𝑛 + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ ran 𝐴 = ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴‘𝑛), (𝐹‘𝑥), 0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫1‘𝐺)) ⇝ (∫1‘𝐹))
Theorem	mbfi1fseqlem1 23527*	Lemma for mbfi1fseq 23533. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((⌊‘((𝐹‘𝑦) · (2↑𝑚))) / (2↑𝑚)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽:(ℕ × ℝ)⟶(0[,)+∞))
Theorem	mbfi1fseqlem2 23528*	Lemma for mbfi1fseq 23533. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((⌊‘((𝐹‘𝑦) · (2↑𝑚))) / (2↑𝑚)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (-𝑚[,]𝑚), if((𝑚𝐽𝑥) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑚𝐽𝑥), 𝑚), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (𝐺‘𝐴) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (-𝐴[,]𝐴), if((𝐴𝐽𝑥) ≤ 𝐴, (𝐴𝐽𝑥), 𝐴), 0)))
Theorem	mbfi1fseqlem3 23529*	Lemma for mbfi1fseq 23533. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((⌊‘((𝐹‘𝑦) · (2↑𝑚))) / (2↑𝑚)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (-𝑚[,]𝑚), if((𝑚𝐽𝑥) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑚𝐽𝑥), 𝑚), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝐴):ℝ⟶ran (𝑚 ∈ (0...(𝐴 · (2↑𝐴))) ↦ (𝑚 / (2↑𝐴))))
Theorem	mbfi1fseqlem4 23530*	Lemma for mbfi1fseq 23533. This lemma is not as interesting as it is long - it is simply checking that 𝐺 is in fact a sequence of simple functions, by verifying that its range is in (0...𝑛2↑𝑛) / (2↑𝑛) (which is to say, the numbers from 0 to 𝑛 in increments of 1 / (2↑𝑛)), and also that the preimage of each point 𝑘 is measurable, because it is equal to (-𝑛[,]𝑛) ∩ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)𝑘 + 1 / (2↑𝑛))) for 𝑘 < 𝑛 and (-𝑛[,]𝑛) ∩ (◡𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) for 𝑘 = 𝑛. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((⌊‘((𝐹‘𝑦) · (2↑𝑚))) / (2↑𝑚)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (-𝑚[,]𝑚), if((𝑚𝐽𝑥) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑚𝐽𝑥), 𝑚), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)
Theorem	mbfi1fseqlem5 23531*	Lemma for mbfi1fseq 23533. Verify that 𝐺 describes an increasing sequence of positive functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((⌊‘((𝐹‘𝑦) · (2↑𝑚))) / (2↑𝑚)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (-𝑚[,]𝑚), if((𝑚𝐽𝑥) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑚𝐽𝑥), 𝑚), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ) → (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝐺‘𝐴) ∧ (𝐺‘𝐴) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝐺‘(𝐴 + 1))))
Theorem	mbfi1fseqlem6 23532*	Lemma for mbfi1fseq 23533. Verify that 𝐺 converges pointwise to 𝐹, and wrap up the existence quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((⌊‘((𝐹‘𝑦) · (2↑𝑚))) / (2↑𝑚)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ (-𝑚[,]𝑚), if((𝑚𝐽𝑥) ≤ 𝑚, (𝑚𝐽𝑥), 𝑚), 0)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ℕ⟶dom ∫1 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑔‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑔‘(𝑛 + 1))) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	mbfi1fseq 23533*	A characterization of measurability in terms of simple functions (this is an if and only if for nonnegative functions, although we don't prove it). Any nonnegative measurable function is the limit of an increasing sequence of nonnegative simple functions. This proof is an example of a poor de Bruijn factor - the formalized proof is much longer than an average hand proof, which usually just describes the function 𝐺 and "leaves the details as an exercise to the reader". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ℕ⟶dom ∫1 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑔‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑔‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑔‘(𝑛 + 1))) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	mbfi1flimlem 23534*	Lemma for mbfi1flim 23535. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ℕ⟶dom ∫1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	mbfi1flim 23535*	Any real measurable function has a sequence of simple functions that converges to it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ℕ⟶dom ∫1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑔‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	mbfmullem2 23536*	Lemma for mbfmul 23538. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑄‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐺‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺) ∈ MblFn)
Theorem	mbfmullem 23537	Lemma for mbfmul 23538. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺) ∈ MblFn)
Theorem	mbfmul 23538	The product of two measurable functions is measurable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ MblFn)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺) ∈ MblFn)
Theorem	itg2lcl 23539*	The set of lower sums is a set of extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 = (∫1‘𝑔))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ*
Theorem	itg2val 23540*	Value of the integral on nonnegative real functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 = (∫1‘𝑔))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) → (∫2‘𝐹) = sup(𝐿, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	itg2l 23541*	Elementhood in the set 𝐿 of lower sums of the integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 = (∫1‘𝑔))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 = (∫1‘𝑔)))
Theorem	itg2lr 23542*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set 𝐿. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 = (∫1‘𝑔))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹) → (∫1‘𝐺) ∈ 𝐿)
Theorem	xrge0f 23543	A real function is a nonnegative extended real function if all its values are greater or equal to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:ℝ⟶ℝ ∧ 0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹) → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞))
Theorem	itg2cl 23544	The integral of a nonnegative real function is an extended real number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	itg2ub 23545	The integral of a nonnegative real function 𝐹 is an upper bound on the integrals of all simple functions 𝐺 dominated by 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹) → (∫1‘𝐺) ≤ (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2leub 23546*	Any upper bound on the integrals of all simple functions 𝐺 dominated by 𝐹 is greater than (∫2‘𝐹), the least upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((∫2‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 → (∫1‘𝑔) ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	itg2ge0 23547	The integral of a nonnegative real function is greater or equal to zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) → 0 ≤ (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2itg1 23548	The integral of a nonnegative simple function using ∫2 is the same as its value under ∫1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹) → (∫2‘𝐹) = (∫1‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg20 23549	The integral of the zero function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (∫2‘(ℝ × {0})) = 0
Theorem	itg2lecl 23550	If an ∫2 integral is bounded above, then it is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ (∫2‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴) → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	itg2le 23551	If one function dominates another, then the integral of the larger is also larger. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐺:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) ∧ 𝐹 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐺) → (∫2‘𝐹) ≤ (∫2‘𝐺))
Theorem	itg2const 23552*	Integral of a constant function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom vol ∧ (vol‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,)+∞)) → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))) = (𝐵 · (vol‘𝐴)))
Theorem	itg2const2 23553*	When the base set of a constant function has infinite volume, the integral is also infinite and vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom vol ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ((vol‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ↔ (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))) ∈ ℝ))
Theorem	itg2seq 23554*	Definitional property of the ∫2 integral: for any function 𝐹 there is a countable sequence 𝑔 of simple functions less than 𝐹 whose integrals converge to the integral of 𝐹. (This theorem is for the most part unnecessary in lieu of itg2i1fseq 23567, but unlike that theorem this one doesn't require 𝐹 to be measurable.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ℕ⟶dom ∫1 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (𝑔‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫2‘𝐹) = sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫1‘(𝑔‘𝑛))), ℝ*, < )))
Theorem	itg2uba 23555*	Approximate version of itg2ub 23545. If 𝐹 approximately dominates 𝐺, then ∫1𝐺 ≤ ∫2𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘𝐴) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐺‘𝑥) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘𝐺) ≤ (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2lea 23556*	Approximate version of itg2le 23551. If 𝐹 ≤ 𝐺 for almost all 𝑥, then ∫2𝐹 ≤ ∫2𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘𝐴) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ≤ (∫2‘𝐺))
Theorem	itg2eqa 23557*	Approximate equality of integrals. If 𝐹 = 𝐺 for almost all 𝑥, then ∫2𝐹 = ∫2𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℝ⟶(0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘𝐴) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ∖ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) = (∫2‘𝐺))
Theorem	itg2mulclem 23558	Lemma for itg2mulc 23559. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘((ℝ × {𝐴}) ∘𝑓 · 𝐹)) ≤ (𝐴 · (∫2‘𝐹)))
Theorem	itg2mulc 23559	The integral of a nonnegative constant times a function is the constant times the integral of the original function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (0[,)+∞))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘((ℝ × {𝐴}) ∘𝑓 · 𝐹)) = (𝐴 · (∫2‘𝐹)))
Theorem	itg2splitlem 23560*	Lemma for itg2split 23561. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom vol)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom vol)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐶, 0))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝐶, 0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝐶, 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐻) ≤ ((∫2‘𝐹) + (∫2‘𝐺)))
Theorem	itg2split 23561*	The ∫2 integral splits under an almost disjoint union. (The proof avoids the use of itg2add 23571 which requires CC.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom vol)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ dom vol)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (vol*‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝐶 ∈ (0[,]+∞))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐶, 0))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝐶, 0))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑈, 𝐶, 0))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐻) = ((∫2‘𝐹) + (∫2‘𝐺)))
Theorem	itg2monolem1 23562*	Lemma for itg2mono 23565. We show that for any constant 𝑡 less than one, 𝑡 · ∫1𝐻 is less than 𝑆, and so ∫1𝐻 ≤ 𝑆, which is one half of the equality in itg2mono 23565. Consider the sequence 𝐴(𝑛) = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑡 · 𝐻 ≤ 𝐹(𝑛)}. This is an increasing sequence of measurable sets whose union is ℝ, and so 𝐻 ↾ 𝐴(𝑛) has an integral which equals ∫1𝐻 in the limit, by itg1climres 23526. Then by taking the limit in (𝑡 · 𝐻) ↾ 𝐴(𝑛) ≤ 𝐹(𝑛), we get 𝑡 · ∫1𝐻 ≤ 𝑆 as desired. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥)), ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛):ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑛 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑦)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫2‘(𝐹‘𝑛))), ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (0(,)1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑇 · (𝐻‘𝑥)) ≤ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 · (∫1‘𝐻)) ≤ 𝑆)
Theorem	itg2monolem2 23563*	Lemma for itg2mono 23565. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥)), ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛):ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑛 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑦)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫2‘(𝐹‘𝑛))), ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (∫1‘𝑃) ≤ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	itg2monolem3 23564*	Lemma for itg2mono 23565. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥)), ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛):ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑛 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑦)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫2‘(𝐹‘𝑛))), ℝ*, < )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (∫1‘𝑃) ≤ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫1‘𝑃) ≤ 𝑆)
Theorem	itg2mono 23565*	The Monotone Convergence Theorem for nonnegative functions. If {(𝐹‘𝑛):𝑛 ∈ ℕ} is a monotone increasing sequence of positive, measurable, real-valued functions, and 𝐺 is the pointwise limit of the sequence, then (∫2‘𝐺) is the limit of the sequence {(∫2‘(𝐹‘𝑛)):𝑛 ∈ ℕ}. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥)), ℝ, < ))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛):ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑛 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝐹‘𝑛)‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑦)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫2‘(𝐹‘𝑛))), ℝ*, < )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐺) = 𝑆)
Theorem	itg2i1fseqle 23566*	Subject to the conditions coming from mbfi1fseq 23533, the sequence of simple functions are all less than the target function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑃‘𝑀) ∘𝑟 ≤ 𝐹)
Theorem	itg2i1fseq 23567*	Subject to the conditions coming from mbfi1fseq 23533, the integral of the sequence of simple functions converges to the integral of the target function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫1‘(𝑃‘𝑚)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) = sup(ran 𝑆, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	itg2i1fseq2 23568*	In an extension to the results of itg2i1fseq 23567, if there is an upper bound on the integrals of the simple functions approaching 𝐹, then ∫2𝐹 is real and the standard limit relation applies. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫1‘(𝑃‘𝑚)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (∫1‘(𝑃‘𝑘)) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⇝ (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2i1fseq3 23569*	Special case of itg2i1fseq2 23568: if the integral of 𝐹 is a real number, then the standard limit relation holds on the integrals of simple functions approaching 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑚 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫1‘(𝑃‘𝑚)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⇝ (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2addlem 23570*	Lemma for itg2add 23571. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑃‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑃‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄:ℕ⟶dom ∫1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ (0𝑝 ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑄‘𝑛) ∧ (𝑄‘𝑛) ∘𝑟 ≤ (𝑄‘(𝑛 + 1))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑄‘𝑛)‘𝑥)) ⇝ (𝐺‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘(𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺)) = ((∫2‘𝐹) + (∫2‘𝐺)))
Theorem	itg2add 23571	The ∫2 integral is linear. (Measurability is an essential component of this theorem; otherwise consider the characteristic function of a nonmeasurable set and its complement.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘(𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺)) = ((∫2‘𝐹) + (∫2‘𝐺)))
Theorem	itg2gt0 23572*	If the function 𝐹 is strictly positive on a set of positive measure, then the integral of the function is positive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom vol)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (vol‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 < (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2cnlem1 23573*	Lemma for itgcn 23654. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(ran (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑛, (𝐹‘𝑥), 0)))), ℝ*, < ) = (∫2‘𝐹))
Theorem	itg2cnlem2 23574*	Lemma for itgcn 23654. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑀, (𝐹‘𝑥), 0))) ≤ ((∫2‘𝐹) − (𝐶 / 2)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom vol((vol‘𝑢) < 𝑑 → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, (𝐹‘𝑥), 0))) < 𝐶))
Theorem	itg2cn 23575*	A sort of absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral (this is the core of ftc1a 23845 which is about actual absolute continuity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶(0[,)+∞))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ dom vol((vol‘𝑢) < 𝑑 → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝑢, (𝐹‘𝑥), 0))) < 𝐶))
Theorem	ibllem 23576	Conditioned equality theorem for the if statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵), 𝐵, 0) = if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐶), 𝐶, 0))
Theorem	isibl 23577*	The predicate "𝐹 is integrable". The "integrable" predicate corresponds roughly to the range of validity of ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥, which is to say that the expression ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 doesn't make sense unless (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑇), 𝑇, 0)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 = (ℜ‘(𝐵 / (i↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ MblFn ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...3)(∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)))
Theorem	isibl2 23578*	The predicate "𝐹 is integrable" when 𝐹 is a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑇), 𝑇, 0)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 = (ℜ‘(𝐵 / (i↑𝑘))))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ MblFn ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...3)(∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)))
Theorem	iblmbf 23579	An integrable function is measurable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1 → 𝐹 ∈ MblFn)
Theorem	iblitg 23580*	If a function is integrable, then the ∫2 integrals of the function's decompositions all exist. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑇), 𝑇, 0)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 = (ℜ‘(𝐵 / (i↑𝐾))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) → (∫2‘𝐺) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	dfitg 23581*	Evaluate the class substitution in df-itg 23437. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑇 = (ℜ‘(𝐵 / (i↑𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑇), 𝑇, 0))))
Theorem	itgex 23582	An integral is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	itgeq1f 23583	Equality theorem for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥)
Theorem	itgeq1 23584*	Equality theorem for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥)
Theorem	nfitg1 23585	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥
Theorem	nfitg 23586*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an integral: if 𝑦 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥
Theorem	cbvitg 23587*	Change bound variable in an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑦
Theorem	cbvitgv 23588*	Change bound variable in an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑦
Theorem	itgeq2 23589	Equality theorem for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥)
Theorem	itgresr 23590	The domain of an integral only matters in its intersection with ℝ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫(𝐴 ∩ ℝ)𝐵 d𝑥
Theorem	itg0 23591	The integral of anything on the empty set is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ∫∅𝐴 d𝑥 = 0
Theorem	itgz 23592	The integral of zero on any set is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ∫𝐴0 d𝑥 = 0
Theorem	itgeq2dv 23593*	Equality theorem for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jul-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥)
Theorem	itgmpt 23594*	Change bound variable in an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 = ∫𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑦) d𝑦)
Theorem	itgcl 23595*	The integral of an integrable function is a complex number. This is Metamath 100 proof #86. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jun-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∫𝐴𝐵 d𝑥 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	itgvallem 23596*	Substitution lemma. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (i↑𝐾) = 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ (ℜ‘(𝐵 / (i↑𝑘)))), (ℜ‘(𝐵 / (i↑𝑘))), 0))) = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ (ℜ‘(𝐵 / 𝑇))), (ℜ‘(𝐵 / 𝑇)), 0))))
Theorem	itgvallem3 23597*	Lemma for itgposval 23607 and itgreval 23608. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝐵), 𝐵, 0))) = 0)
Theorem	ibl0 23598	The zero function is integrable on any measurable set. (Unlike iblconst 23629, this does not require 𝐴 to have finite measure.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom vol → (𝐴 × {0}) ∈ 𝐿1)
Theorem	iblcnlem1 23599*	Lemma for iblcnlem 23600. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ (ℜ‘𝐵)), (ℜ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ -(ℜ‘𝐵)), -(ℜ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ (ℑ‘𝐵)), (ℑ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ -(ℑ‘𝐵)), -(ℑ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ MblFn ∧ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ))))
Theorem	iblcnlem 23600*	Expand out the forall in isibl2 23578. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ (ℜ‘𝐵)), (ℜ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ -(ℜ‘𝐵)), -(ℜ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ (ℑ‘𝐵)), (ℑ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ -(ℑ‘𝐵)), -(ℑ‘𝐵), 0)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐿1 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ MblFn ∧ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ℝ))))