HomeTheorem List (p. 170 of 429)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 170 of 429) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27903) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27904-29428) |
Users' Mathboxes
(29429-42879) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Definition | df-curf 16901* | Define the curry functor, which maps a functor 𝐹:𝐶 × 𝐷⟶𝐸 to curryF (𝐹):𝐶⟶(𝐷⟶𝐸). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ curryF = (𝑒 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑒) / 𝑐⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑒) / 𝑑⦌⟨(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ⟨(𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑑) ↦ (𝑥(1st ‘𝑓)𝑦)), (𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑑), 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑑) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝑑)𝑧) ↦ (((Id‘𝑐)‘𝑥)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(2nd ‘𝑓)⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)𝑔)))⟩), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦) ↦ (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑑) ↦ (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩(2nd ‘𝑓)⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)((Id‘𝑑)‘𝑧)))))⟩) | ||
| Definition | df-uncf 16902* | Define the uncurry functor, which can be defined equationally using evalF. Strictly speaking, the third category argument is not needed, since the resulting functor is extensionally equal regardless, but it is used in the equational definition and is too much work to remove. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ uncurryF = (𝑐 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (((𝑐‘1) evalF (𝑐‘2)) ∘func ((𝑓 ∘func ((𝑐‘0) 1stF (𝑐‘1))) ⟨,⟩F ((𝑐‘0) 2ndF (𝑐‘1))))) | ||
| Definition | df-diag 16903* | Define the diagonal functor, which is the functor 𝐶⟶(𝐷 Func 𝐶) whose object part is 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑥). The value of the functor at an object 𝑥 is the constant functor which maps all objects in 𝐷 to 𝑥 and all morphisms to 1(𝑥). The morphism part is a natural transformation between these functors, which takes 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝑦 to the natural transformation with every component equal to 𝑓. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ Δfunc = (𝑐 ∈ Cat, 𝑑 ∈ Cat ↦ (⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ curryF (𝑐 1stF 𝑑))) | ||
| Theorem | evlfval 16904* | Value of the evaluation functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ⟨(𝑓 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥)), (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐶 Func 𝐷) × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ ((𝐶 Func 𝐷) × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑥) / 𝑚⦌⦋(1st ‘𝑦) / 𝑛⦌(𝑎 ∈ (𝑚𝑁𝑛), 𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻(2nd ‘𝑦)) ↦ ((𝑎‘(2nd ‘𝑦))(⟨((1st ‘𝑚)‘(2nd ‘𝑥)), ((1st ‘𝑚)‘(2nd ‘𝑦))⟩ · ((1st ‘𝑛)‘(2nd ‘𝑦)))(((2nd ‘𝑥)(2nd ‘𝑚)(2nd ‘𝑦))‘𝑔))))⟩) | ||
| Theorem | evlf2 16905* | Value of the evaluation functor at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = (𝑎 ∈ (𝐹𝑁𝐺), 𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑌)(⟨((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋), ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)⟩ · ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑌))((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝑔)))) | ||
| Theorem | evlf2val 16906 | Value of the evaluation natural transformation at an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹𝑁𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐾) = ((𝐴‘𝑌)(⟨((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋), ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑌)⟩ · ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑌))((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑌)‘𝐾))) | ||
| Theorem | evlf1 16907 | Value of the evaluation functor at an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(1st ‘𝐸)𝑋) = ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | evlfcllem 16908 | Lemma for evlfcl 16909. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐶 Nat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝐷) ∧ 𝑍 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐹𝑁𝐺) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑌))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐺𝑁𝐻) ∧ 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑍))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐻, 𝑍⟩)‘(⟨𝐵, 𝐿⟩(⟨⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩⟩(comp‘(𝑄 ×c 𝐶))⟨𝐻, 𝑍⟩)⟨𝐴, 𝐾⟩)) = (((⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐻, 𝑍⟩)‘⟨𝐵, 𝐿⟩)(⟨((1st ‘𝐸)‘⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩), ((1st ‘𝐸)‘⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩)⟩(comp‘𝐷)((1st ‘𝐸)‘⟨𝐻, 𝑍⟩))((⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑌⟩)‘⟨𝐴, 𝐾⟩))) | ||
| Theorem | evlfcl 16909 | The evaluation functor is a bifunctor (a two-argument functor) with the first parameter taking values in the set of functors 𝐶⟶𝐷, and the second parameter in 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐶 evalF 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ((𝑄 ×c 𝐶) Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | curfval 16910* | Value of the curry functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = ⟨(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⟨(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥(1st ‘𝐹)𝑦)), (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐽𝑧) ↦ (( 1 ‘𝑥)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)𝑔)))⟩), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩)(𝐼‘𝑧)))))⟩) | ||
| Theorem | curf1fval 16911* | Value of the object part of the curry functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ⟨(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥(1st ‘𝐹)𝑦)), (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐽𝑧) ↦ (( 1 ‘𝑥)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)𝑔)))⟩)) | ||
| Theorem | curf1 16912* | Value of the object part of the curry functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = ⟨(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑋(1st ‘𝐹)𝑦)), (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐽𝑧) ↦ (( 1 ‘𝑋)(⟨𝑋, 𝑦⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑋, 𝑧⟩)𝑔)))⟩) | ||
| Theorem | curf11 16913 | Value of the double evaluated curry functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐾)‘𝑌) = (𝑋(1st ‘𝐹)𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | curf12 16914 | The partially evaluated curry functor at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑌𝐽𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑌(2nd ‘𝐾)𝑍)‘𝐻) = (( 1 ‘𝑋)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑋, 𝑍⟩)𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | curf1cl 16915 | The partially evaluated curry functor is a functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | curf2 16916* | Value of the curry functor at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑌)‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑧⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑌, 𝑧⟩)(𝐼‘𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | curf2val 16917 | Value of a component of the curry functor natural transformation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑌)‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐿‘𝑍) = (𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑍⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩)(𝐼‘𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | curf2cl 16918 | The curry functor at a morphism is a natural transformation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Id‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ 𝐿 = ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑌)‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐷 Nat 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋)𝑁((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | curfcl 16919 | The curry functor of a functor 𝐹:𝐶 × 𝐷⟶𝐸 is a functor curryF (𝐹):𝐶⟶(𝐷⟶𝐸). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | curfpropd 16920 | If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they curry the same functor to the same result. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐴) = (Homf ‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐴) = (compf‘𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴 ×c 𝐶) Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ curryF 𝐹) = (⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | uncfval 16921 | Value of the uncurry functor, which is the reverse of the curry functor, taking 𝐺:𝐶⟶(𝐷⟶𝐸) to uncurryF (𝐺):𝐶 × 𝐷⟶𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (⟨“𝐶𝐷𝐸”⟩ uncurryF 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = ((𝐷 evalF 𝐸) ∘func ((𝐺 ∘func (𝐶 1stF 𝐷)) ⟨,⟩F (𝐶 2ndF 𝐷)))) | ||
| Theorem | uncfcl 16922 | The uncurry operation takes a functor 𝐹:𝐶⟶(𝐷⟶𝐸) to a functor uncurryF (𝐹):𝐶 × 𝐷⟶𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (⟨“𝐶𝐷𝐸”⟩ uncurryF 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | uncf1 16923 | Value of the uncurry functor on an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (⟨“𝐶𝐷𝐸”⟩ uncurryF 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(1st ‘𝐹)𝑌) = ((1st ‘((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋))‘𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | uncf2 16924 | Value of the uncurry functor on a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (⟨“𝐶𝐷𝐸”⟩ uncurryF 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑌𝐽𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝐹)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝑆) = ((((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐺)𝑍)‘𝑅)‘𝑊)(⟨((1st ‘((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋))‘𝑌), ((1st ‘((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋))‘𝑊)⟩(comp‘𝐸)((1st ‘((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑍))‘𝑊))((𝑌(2nd ‘((1st ‘𝐺)‘𝑋))𝑊)‘𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | curfuncf 16925 | Cancellation of curry with uncurry. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (⟨“𝐶𝐷𝐸”⟩ uncurryF 𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 Func (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐸))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | uncfcurf 16926 | Cancellation of uncurry with curry. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝐷) Func 𝐸)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐶𝐷𝐸”⟩ uncurryF 𝐺) = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | diagval 16927 | Define the diagonal functor, which is the functor 𝐶⟶(𝐷 Func 𝐶) whose object part is 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑥). We can define this equationally as the currying of the first projection functor, and by expressing it this way we get a quick proof of functoriality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 = (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF (𝐶 1stF 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | diagcl 16928 | The diagonal functor is a functor from the base category to the functor category. Another way of saying this is that the constant functor (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑋) is a construction that is natural in 𝑋 (and covariant). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | diag1cl 16929 | The constant functor of 𝑋 is a functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐷 Func 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | diag11 16930 | Value of the constant functor at an object. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝐾)‘𝑌) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | diag12 16931 | Value of the constant functor at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐾 = ((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑌𝐽𝑍)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑌(2nd ‘𝐾)𝑍)‘𝐹) = ( 1 ‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | diag2 16932 | Value of the diagonal functor at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐿)𝑌)‘𝐹) = (𝐵 × {𝐹})) | ||
| Theorem | diag2cl 16933 | The diagonal functor at a morphism is a natural transformation between constant functors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝐶Δfunc𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝐷 Nat 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 × {𝐹}) ∈ (((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑋)𝑁((1st ‘𝐿)‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | curf2ndf 16934 | As shown in diagval 16927, the currying of the first projection is the diagonal functor. On the other hand, the currying of the second projection is 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝑦), which is a constant functor of the identity functor at 𝐷. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐷 FuncCat 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ curryF (𝐶 2ndF 𝐷)) = ((1st ‘(𝑄Δfunc𝐶))‘(idfunc‘𝐷))) | ||
| Syntax | chof 16935 | Extend class notation with the Hom functor. |
| class HomF | ||
| Syntax | cyon 16936 | Extend class notation with the Yoneda embedding. |
| class Yon | ||
| Definition | df-hof 16937* | Define the Hom functor, which is a bifunctor (a functor of two arguments), contravariant in the first argument and covariant in the second, from (oppCat‘𝐶) × 𝐶 to SetCat, whose object part is the hom-function Hom, and with morphism part given by pre- and post-composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ HomF = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⟨(Homf ‘𝑐), ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌(𝑥 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏), 𝑦 ∈ (𝑏 × 𝑏) ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑦)(Hom ‘𝑐)(1st ‘𝑥)), 𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)(Hom ‘𝑐)(2nd ‘𝑦)) ↦ (ℎ ∈ ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ↦ ((𝑔(𝑥(comp‘𝑐)(2nd ‘𝑦))ℎ)(⟨(1st ‘𝑦), (1st ‘𝑥)⟩(comp‘𝑐)(2nd ‘𝑦))𝑓))))⟩) | ||
| Definition | df-yon 16938 | Define the Yoneda embedding, which is the currying of the (opposite) Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ Yon = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (⟨𝑐, (oppCat‘𝑐)⟩ curryF (HomF‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))) | ||
| Theorem | hofval 16939* | Value of the Hom functor, which is a bifunctor (a functor of two arguments), contravariant in the first argument and covariant in the second, from (oppCat‘𝐶) × 𝐶 to SetCat, whose object part is the hom-function Hom, and with morphism part given by pre- and post-composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = ⟨(Homf ‘𝐶), (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵) ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑦)𝐻(1st ‘𝑥)), 𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻(2nd ‘𝑦)) ↦ (ℎ ∈ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↦ ((𝑔(𝑥 · (2nd ‘𝑦))ℎ)(⟨(1st ‘𝑦), (1st ‘𝑥)⟩ · (2nd ‘𝑦))𝑓))))⟩) | ||
| Theorem | hof1fval 16940 | The object part of the Hom functor is the Homf operation, which is just a functionalized version of Hom. That is, it is a two argument function, which maps 𝑋, 𝑌 to the set of morphisms from 𝑋 to 𝑌. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1st ‘𝑀) = (Homf ‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | hof1 16941 | The object part of the Hom functor maps 𝑋, 𝑌 to the set of morphisms from 𝑋 to 𝑌. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(1st ‘𝑀)𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | hof2fval 16942* | The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms ⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩:⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩⟶⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩ (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋), 𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊) ↦ (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝑓)))) | ||
| Theorem | hof2val 16943* | The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms ⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩:⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩⟶⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩ (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐺) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | hof2 16944 | The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms ⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩:⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩⟶⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩ (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐺)‘𝐾) = ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)𝐾)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | hofcllem 16945 | Lemma for hofcl 16946. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑆𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑊𝐻𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾(⟨𝑆, 𝑍⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑃)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑆, 𝑇⟩)(𝑄(⟨𝑌, 𝑊⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑇)𝐿)) = ((𝑃(⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑆, 𝑇⟩)𝑄)(⟨(𝑋𝐻𝑌), (𝑍𝐻𝑊)⟩(comp‘𝐷)(𝑆𝐻𝑇))(𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐿))) | ||
| Theorem | hofcl 16946 | Closure of the Hom functor. Note that the codomain is the category SetCat‘𝑈 for any universe 𝑈 which contains each Hom-set. This corresponds to the assertion that 𝐶 be locally small (with respect to 𝑈). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((𝑂 ×c 𝐶) Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | oppchofcl 16947 | Closure of the opposite Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝑂) Func 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | yonval 16948 | Value of the Yoneda embedding. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 = (⟨𝐶, 𝑂⟩ curryF 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | yoncl 16949 | The Yoneda embedding is a functor from the category to the category 𝑄 of presheaves on 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | yon1cl 16950 | The Yoneda embedding at an object of 𝐶 is a presheaf on 𝐶, also known as the contravariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | yon11 16951 | Value of the Yoneda embedding at an object. The partially evaluated Yoneda embedding is also the contravariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋))‘𝑍) = (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | yon12 16952 | Value of the Yoneda embedding at a morphism. The partially evaluated Yoneda embedding is also the contravariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑊𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑍(2nd ‘((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋))𝑊)‘𝐹)‘𝐺) = (𝐺(⟨𝑊, 𝑍⟩ · 𝑋)𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | yon2 16953 | Value of the Yoneda embedding at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑊𝐻𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑋(2nd ‘𝑌)𝑍)‘𝐹)‘𝑊)‘𝐺) = (𝐹(⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑍)𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | hofpropd 16954 | If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (HomF‘𝐶) = (HomF‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | yonpropd 16955 | If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same Yoneda functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Yon‘𝐶) = (Yon‘𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | oppcyon 16956 | Value of the opposite Yoneda embedding. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 = (⟨𝑂, 𝐶⟩ curryF 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | oyoncl 16957 | The opposite Yoneda embedding is a functor from oppCat‘𝐶 to the functor category 𝐶 → SetCat. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑄)) | ||
| Theorem | oyon1cl 16958 | The opposite Yoneda embedding at an object of 𝐶 is a functor from 𝐶 to Set, also known as the covariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝑂) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem1 16959 | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) Func 𝑇) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) Func 𝑇))) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem21 16960 | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋) = (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem3a 16961* | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹𝑀𝑋) = (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐹) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑋)‘( 1 ‘𝑋))) ∧ (𝐹𝑀𝑋):(𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋)⟶(𝐹(1st ‘𝐸)𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem4a 16962* | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹𝑁𝑋)‘𝐴) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ↦ (((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem4b 16963* | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑃(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐹𝑁𝑋)‘𝐴)‘𝑃)‘𝐺) = (((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑃)‘𝐺)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem4c 16964* | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹𝑁𝑋)‘𝐴) ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem22 16965 | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝑍)⟨𝐺, 𝑃⟩)𝐾) = (((𝑃(2nd ‘𝑌)𝑋)‘𝐾)(⟨((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋), 𝐹⟩(2nd ‘𝐻)⟨((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑃), 𝐺⟩)𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem3b 16966* | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺𝑀𝑃)(⟨(𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋), (𝐺(1st ‘𝑍)𝑃)⟩(comp‘𝑇)(𝐺(1st ‘𝐸)𝑃))(𝐴(⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝑍)⟨𝐺, 𝑃⟩)𝐾)) = ((𝐴(⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑃⟩)𝐾)(⟨(𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋), (𝐹(1st ‘𝐸)𝑋)⟩(comp‘𝑇)(𝐺(1st ‘𝐸)𝑃))(𝐹𝑀𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | yonedalem3 16967* | Lemma for yoneda 16970. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) Nat 𝑇)𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | yonedainv 16968* | The Yoneda Lemma with explicit inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀(𝑍𝐼𝐸)𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | yonffthlem 16969* | Lemma for yonffth 16971. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝑄) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | yoneda 16970* | The Yoneda Lemma. There is a natural isomorphism between the functors 𝑍 and 𝐸, where 𝑍(𝐹, 𝑋) is the natural transformations from Yon(𝑋) = Hom ( − , 𝑋) to 𝐹, and 𝐸(𝐹, 𝑋) = 𝐹(𝑋) is the evaluation functor. Here we need two universes to state the claim: the smaller universe 𝑈 is used for forming the functor category 𝑄 = 𝐶 op → SetCat(𝑈), which itself does not (necessarily) live in 𝑈 but instead is an element of the larger universe 𝑉. (If 𝑈 is a Grothendieck universe, then it will be closed under this "presheaf" operation, and so we can set 𝑈 = 𝑉 in this case.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) & ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄) & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥)))) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | yonffth 16971 | The Yoneda Lemma. The Yoneda embedding, the curried Hom functor, is full and faithful, and hence is a representation of the category 𝐶 as a full subcategory of the category 𝑄 of presheaves on 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝑄) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝑄))) | ||
| Theorem | yoniso 16972* | If the codomain is recoverable from a hom-set, then the Yoneda embedding is injective on objects, and hence is an isomorphism from 𝐶 into a full subcategory of a presheaf category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (CatCat‘𝑉) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑄 ↾s ran (1st ‘𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → (𝐹‘(𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)) = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐸)) | ||
| Syntax | cpreset 16973 | Extend class notation with the class of all presets. |
| class Preset | ||
| Syntax | cdrs 16974 | Extend class notation with the class of all directed sets. |
| class Dirset | ||
| Definition | df-preset 16975* |
Define the class of preordered sets (presets). A preset is a set
equipped with a transitive and reflexive relation.
Preorders are a natural generalization of order for sets where there is a well-defined ordering, but it in some sense "fails to capture the whole story", in that there may be pairs of elements which are indistinguishable under the order. Two elements which are not equal but are less-or-equal to each other behave the same under all order operations and may be thought of as "tied". A preorder can naturally be strengthened by requiring that there are no ties, resulting in a partial order, or by stating that all comparable pairs of elements are tied, resulting in an equivalence relation. Every preorder naturally factors into these two types; the tied relation on a preorder is an equivalence relation and the quotient under that relation is a partial order. (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ Preset = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑏][(le‘𝑓) / 𝑟]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑟𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧) → 𝑥𝑟𝑧))} | ||
| Definition | df-drs 16976* |
Define the class of directed sets. A directed set is a nonempty
preordered set where every pair of elements have some upper bound. Note
that it is not required that there exist a least upper bound.
There is no consensus in the literature over whether directed sets are allowed to be empty. It is slightly more convenient for us if they are not. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ Dirset = {𝑓 ∈ Preset ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑏][(le‘𝑓) / 𝑟](𝑏 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑟𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧))} | ||
| Theorem | isprs 16977* | Property of being a preordered set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Preset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | prslem 16978 | Lemma for prsref 16979 and prstr 16980. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | prsref 16979 | Less-or-equal is reflexive in a preset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | prstr 16980 | Less-or-equal is transitive in a preset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍)) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | isdrs 16981* | Property of being a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | drsdir 16982* | Direction of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | drsprs 16983 | A directed set is a preset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset → 𝐾 ∈ Preset ) | ||
| Theorem | drsbn0 16984 | The base of a directed set is not empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | drsdirfi 16985* | Any finite number of elements in a directed set have a common upper bound. Here is where the nonemptiness constraint in df-drs 16976 first comes into play; without it we would need an additional constraint that 𝑋 not be empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | isdrs2 16986* | Directed sets may be defined in terms of finite subsets. Again, without nonemptiness we would need to restrict to nonempty subsets here. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
| Syntax | cpo 16987 | Extend class notation with the class of posets. |
| class Poset | ||
| Syntax | cplt 16988 | Extend class notation with less-than for posets. |
| class lt | ||
| Syntax | club 16989 | Extend class notation with poset least upper bound. |
| class lub | ||
| Syntax | cglb 16990 | Extend class notation with poset greatest lower bound. |
| class glb | ||
| Syntax | cjn 16991 | Extend class notation with poset join. |
| class join | ||
| Syntax | cmee 16992 | Extend class notation with poset meet. |
| class meet | ||
| Definition | df-poset 16993* |
Define the class of partially ordered sets (posets). A poset is a set
equipped with a partial order, that is, a binary relation which is
reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. Unlike a total order, in a
partial order there may be pairs of elements where neither precedes the
other. Definition of poset in [Crawley] p. 1. Note that
Crawley-Dilworth require that a poset base set be nonempty, but we
follow the convention of most authors who don't make this a requirement.
In our formalism of extensible structures, the base set of a poset 𝑓 is denoted by (Base‘𝑓) and its partial order by (le‘𝑓) (for "less than or equal to"). The quantifiers ∃𝑏∃𝑟 provide a notational shorthand to allow us to refer to the base and ordering relation as 𝑏 and 𝑟 in the definition rather than having to repeat (Base‘𝑓) and (le‘𝑓) throughout. These quantifiers can be eliminated with ceqsex2v 3276 and related theorems. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ Poset = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑏∃𝑟(𝑏 = (Base‘𝑓) ∧ 𝑟 = (le‘𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑟𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧) → 𝑥𝑟𝑧)))} | ||
| Theorem | ispos 16994* | The predicate "is a poset." (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))) | ||
| Theorem | ispos2 16995* |
A poset is an antisymmetric preset.
EDITORIAL: could become the definition of poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Preset ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | posprs 16996 | A poset is a preset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Poset → 𝐾 ∈ Preset ) | ||
| Theorem | posi 16997 | Lemma for poset properties. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → 𝑋 = 𝑌) ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | posref 16998 | A poset ordering is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | posasymb 16999 | A poset ordering is asymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | postr 17000 | A poset ordering is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |