P. 145 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 14401-14500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lo1add 14401*	The sum of two eventually upper bounded functions is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1mul 14402*	The product of an eventually upper bounded function and a positive eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1mul2 14403*	The product of an eventually upper bounded function and a positive eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1dif 14404*	If the difference of two functions is eventually bounded, eventual boundedness of either one implies the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)))
Theorem	lo1sub 14405*	The difference of an eventually upper bounded function and an eventually bounded function is eventually upper bounded. The "correct" sharp result here takes the second function to be eventually lower bounded instead of just bounded, but our notation for this is simply (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1), so it is just a special case of lo1add 14401. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	climadd 14406*	Limit of the sum of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 + 𝐵))
Theorem	climmul 14407*	Limit of the product of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(c) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 · 𝐵))
Theorem	climsub 14408*	Limit of the difference of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(b) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	climaddc1 14409*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 added to each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐴 + 𝐶))
Theorem	climaddc2 14410*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 added to each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 + (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 + 𝐴))
Theorem	climmulc2 14411*	Limit of a sequence multiplied by a constant 𝐶. Corollary 12-2.2 of [Gleason] p. 171. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 · 𝐴))
Theorem	climsubc1 14412*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 subtracted from each term of a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐴 − 𝐶))
Theorem	climsubc2 14413*	Limit of a constant 𝐶 minus each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 − (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 − 𝐴))
Theorem	climle 14414*	Comparison of the limits of two sequences. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	climsqz 14415*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	climsqz2 14416*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴)
Theorem	rlimadd 14417*	Limit of the sum of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 + 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimsub 14418*	Limit of the difference of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(b) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 − 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimmul 14419*	Limit of the product of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(c) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 · 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimdiv 14420*	Limit of the quotient of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 / 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 / 𝐸))
Theorem	rlimneg 14421*	Limit of the negative of a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ⇝𝑟 -𝐶)
Theorem	rlimle 14422*	Comparison of the limits of two sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≤ 𝐸)
Theorem	rlimsqzlem 14423*	Lemma for rlimsqz 14424 and rlimsqz2 14425. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐸)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸)
Theorem	rlimsqz 14424*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)
Theorem	rlimsqz2 14425*	Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐷 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷)
Theorem	lo1le 14426*	Transfer eventual upper boundedness from a larger function to a smaller function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1le 14427*	Transfer eventual boundedness from a larger function to a smaller function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐶) ≤ (abs‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	rlimno1 14428*	A function whose inverse converges to zero is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1 / 𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	clim2ser 14429*	The limit of an infinite series with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	clim2ser2 14430*	The limit of an infinite series with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 + (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	iserex 14431*	An infinite series converges, if and only if the series does with initial terms removed. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ))
Theorem	isermulc2 14432*	Multiplication of an infinite series by a constant. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 14-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (𝐶 · 𝐴))
Theorem	climlec2 14433*	Comparison of a constant to the limit of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	iserle 14434*	Comparison of the limits of two infinite series. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
Theorem	iserge0 14435*	The limit of an infinite series of nonnegative reals is nonnegative. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	climub 14436*	The limit of a monotonic sequence is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	climserle 14437*	The partial sums of a converging infinite series with nonnegative terms are bounded by its limit. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	isershft 14438	Index shift of the limit of an infinite series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq(𝑀 + 𝑁)( + , (𝐹 shift 𝑁)) ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	isercolllem1 14439*	Lemma for isercoll 14442. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ) → (𝐺 ↾ 𝑆) Isom < , < (𝑆, (𝐺 “ 𝑆)))
Theorem	isercolllem2 14440*	Lemma for isercoll 14442. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐺‘1))) → (1...(#‘(𝐺 “ (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁))))) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁)))
Theorem	isercolllem3 14441*	Lemma for isercoll 14442. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐺‘1))) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = (seq1( + , 𝐻)‘(#‘(𝐺 “ (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁))))))
Theorem	isercoll 14442*	Rearrange an infinite series by spacing out the terms using an order isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( + , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	isercoll2 14443*	Generalize isercoll 14442 so that both sequences have arbitrary starting point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑊 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴))
Theorem	climsup 14444*	A bounded monotonic sequence converges to the supremum of its range. Theorem 12-5.1 of [Gleason] p. 180. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < ))
Theorem	climcau 14445*	A converging sequence of complex numbers is a Cauchy sequence. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (necessity part). (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)
Theorem	climbdd 14446*	A converging sequence of complex numbers is bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ 𝑥)
Theorem	caucvgrlem 14447*	Lemma for caurcvgr 14448. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (lim sup‘𝐹))) < (3 · 𝑅))))
Theorem	caurcvgr 14448*	A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges to its limit supremum. The third hypothesis specifies that 𝐹 is a Cauchy sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	caucvgrlem2 14449*	Lemma for caucvgr 14450. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    &   ⊢ 𝐻:ℂ⟶ℝ    &   ⊢ (((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∈ ℂ) → (abs‘((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) − (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑗)))) ≤ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑛))) ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ‘(𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)))
Theorem	caucvgr 14450*	A Cauchy sequence of complex numbers converges to a complex number. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (sufficiency part). (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 )
Theorem	caurcvg 14451*	A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges to its limit supremum. The fourth hypothesis specifies that 𝐹 is a Cauchy sequence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑚))) < 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹))
Theorem	caurcvg2 14452*	A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges, existence version. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ ∧ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	caucvg 14453*	A Cauchy sequence of complex numbers converges to a complex number. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (sufficiency part). (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ )
Theorem	caucvgb 14454*	A function is convergent if and only if it is Cauchy. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	serf0 14455*	If an infinite series converges, its underlying sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)
Theorem	iseraltlem1 14456*	Lemma for iseralt 14459. A decreasing sequence with limit zero consists of positive terms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑁))
Theorem	iseraltlem2 14457*	Lemma for iseralt 14459. The terms of an alternating series form a chain of inequalities in alternate terms, so that for example 𝑆(1) ≤ 𝑆(3) ≤ 𝑆(5) ≤ ... and ... ≤ 𝑆(4) ≤ 𝑆(2) ≤ 𝑆(0) (assuming 𝑀 = 0 so that these terms are defined). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ((-1↑𝑁) · (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾)))) ≤ ((-1↑𝑁) · (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
Theorem	iseraltlem3 14458*	Lemma for iseralt 14459. From iseraltlem2 14457, we have (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) and (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1), and we also have (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) for each 𝑛 by the definition of the partial sum 𝑆, so combining the inequalities we get (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) + 𝐺(𝑛 + 1), so ∣ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) − (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ = ∣ 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) − 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ ≤ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) and ∣ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ = ∣ 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ ≤ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1). Thus, both even and odd partial sums are Cauchy if 𝐺 converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ((abs‘((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾))) − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (abs‘((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘((𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾)) + 1)) − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	iseralt 14459*	The alternating series test. If 𝐺(𝑘) is a decreasing sequence that converges to 0, then Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍(-1↑𝑘) · 𝐺(𝑘) is a convergent series. (Note that the first term is positive if 𝑀 is even, and negative if 𝑀 is odd. If the parity of your series does not match up with this, you will need to post-compose the series with multiplication by -1 using isermulc2 14432.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )
5.10.3  Finite and infinite sums
Syntax	csu 14460	Extend class notation to include finite summations. (An underscore was added to the ASCII token in order to facilitate set.mm text searches, since "sum" is a commonly used word in comments.)
class Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Definition	df-sum 14461*	Define the sum of a series with an index set of integers 𝐴. 𝑘 is normally a free variable in 𝐵, i.e. 𝐵 can be thought of as 𝐵(𝑘). This definition is the result of a collection of discussions over the most general definition for a sum that does not need the index set to have a specified ordering. This definition is in two parts, one for finite sums and one for subsets of the upper integers. When summing over a subset of the upper integers, we extend the index set to the upper integers by adding zero outside the domain, and then sum the set in order, setting the result to the limit of the partial sums, if it exists. This means that conditionally convergent sums can be evaluated meaningfully. For finite sums, we are explicitly order-independent, by picking any bijection to a 1-based finite sequence and summing in the induced order. These two methods of summation produce the same result on their common region of definition (i.e. finite sets of integers) by summo 14492. Examples: Σ𝑘 ∈ {1, 2, 4} 𝑘 means 1 + 2 + 4 = 7, and Σ𝑘 ∈ ℕ (1 / (2↑𝑘)) = 1 means 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1 (geoihalfsum 14658). (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚))))
Theorem	sumex 14462	A sum is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	sumeq1 14463	Equality theorem for a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	nfsum1 14464	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	nfsum 14465	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for sum: if 𝑥 is (effectively) not free in 𝐴 and 𝐵, it is not free in Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	sumeq2w 14466	Equality theorem for sum, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2ii 14467*	Equality theorem for sum, with the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 guarded by I to be always sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ( I ‘𝐵) = ( I ‘𝐶) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2 14468*	Equality theorem for sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	cbvsum 14469*	Change bound variable in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvsumv 14470*	Change bound variable in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	cbvsumi 14471*	Change bound variable in a sum. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑘𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐶    &   ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	sumeq1i 14472*	Equality inference for sum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶
Theorem	sumeq2i 14473*	Equality inference for sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶
Theorem	sumeq12i 14474*	Equality inference for sum. (Contributed by FL, 10-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷
Theorem	sumeq1d 14475*	Equality deduction for sum. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2d 14476*	Equality deduction for sum. Note that unlike sumeq2dv 14477, 𝑘 may occur in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2dv 14477*	Equality deduction for sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2ad 14478*	Equality deduction for sum. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	sumeq2sdv 14479*	Equality deduction for sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)
Theorem	2sumeq2dv 14480*	Equality deduction for double sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	sumeq12dv 14481*	Equality deduction for sum. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	sumeq12rdv 14482*	Equality deduction for sum. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷)
Theorem	sum2id 14483*	The second class argument to a sum can be chosen so that it is always a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jul-2013.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ( I ‘𝐵)
Theorem	sumfc 14484*	A lemma to facilitate conversions from the function form to the class-variable form of a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑗) = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵
Theorem	fz1f1o 14485*	A lemma for working with finite sums. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ((#‘𝐴) ∈ ℕ ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:(1...(#‘𝐴))–1-1-onto→𝐴)))
Theorem	sumrblem 14486*	Lemma for sumrb 14488. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2013.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = seq𝑁( + , 𝐹))
Theorem	fsumcvg 14487*	The sequence of partial sums of a finite sum converges to the whole sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝑀...𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))
Theorem	sumrb 14488*	Rebase the starting point of a sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶 ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐶))
Theorem	summolem3 14489*	Lemma for summo 14492. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Mar-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝐾‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑀) = (seq1( + , 𝐻)‘𝑁))
Theorem	summolem2a 14490*	Lemma for summo 14492. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝐾‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 Isom < , < ((1...(#‘𝐴)), 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
Theorem	summolem2 14491*	Lemma for summo 14492. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥)) → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑚)) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	summo 14492*	A sum has at most one limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑚))))
Theorem	zsum 14493*	Series sum with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑍)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 0))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)))
Theorem	isum 14494*	Series sum with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite series). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jul-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 𝐵 = ( ⇝ ‘seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)))
Theorem	fsum 14495*	The value of a sum over a nonempty finite set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝑘 = (𝐹‘𝑛) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑀))
Theorem	sum0 14496	Any sum over the empty set is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ ∅ 𝐴 = 0
Theorem	sumz 14497*	Any sum of zero over a summable set is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 0 = 0)
Theorem	fsumf1o 14498*	Re-index a finite sum using a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐺 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑛 ∈ 𝐶 𝐷)
Theorem	sumss 14499*	Change the index set to a subset in an upper integer sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	fsumss 14500*	Change the index set to a subset in a finite sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)