![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > hof2val | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms 〈𝑓, 𝑔〉:〈𝑋, 𝑌〉⟶〈𝑍, 𝑊〉 (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
hofval.m | ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) |
hofval.c | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) |
hof1.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) |
hof1.h | ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) |
hof1.x | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) |
hof1.y | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) |
hof2.z | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) |
hof2.w | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) |
hof2.o | ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) |
hof2.f | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) |
hof2.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
hof2val | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(2nd ‘𝑀)〈𝑍, 𝑊〉)𝐺) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝐹))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | hofval.m | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶) | |
2 | hofval.c | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) | |
3 | hof1.b | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶) | |
4 | hof1.h | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶) | |
5 | hof1.x | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) | |
6 | hof1.y | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) | |
7 | hof2.z | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) | |
8 | hof2.w | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵) | |
9 | hof2.o | . . 3 ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶) | |
10 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | hof2fval 17102 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(2nd ‘𝑀)〈𝑍, 𝑊〉) = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋), 𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊) ↦ (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑔(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝑓)))) |
11 | simplrr 755 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → 𝑔 = 𝐺) | |
12 | 11 | oveq1d 6807 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → (𝑔(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ) = (𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)) |
13 | simplrl 754 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → 𝑓 = 𝐹) | |
14 | 12, 13 | oveq12d 6810 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) ∧ ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌)) → ((𝑔(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝑓) = ((𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝐹)) |
15 | 14 | mpteq2dva 4876 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 = 𝐺)) → (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝑔(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝑓)) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝐹))) |
16 | hof2.f | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋)) | |
17 | hof2.g | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊)) | |
18 | ovex 6822 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ∈ V | |
19 | 18 | mptex 6629 | . . 3 ⊢ (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝐹)) ∈ V |
20 | 19 | a1i 11 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝐹)) ∈ V) |
21 | 10, 15, 16, 17, 20 | ovmpt2d 6934 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉(2nd ‘𝑀)〈𝑍, 𝑊〉)𝐺) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(〈𝑋, 𝑌〉 · 𝑊)ℎ)(〈𝑍, 𝑋〉 · 𝑊)𝐹))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 382 = wceq 1630 ∈ wcel 2144 Vcvv 3349 〈cop 4320 ↦ cmpt 4861 ‘cfv 6031 (class class class)co 6792 2nd c2nd 7313 Basecbs 16063 Hom chom 16159 compcco 16160 Catccat 16531 HomFchof 17095 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1869 ax-4 1884 ax-5 1990 ax-6 2056 ax-7 2092 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2173 ax-11 2189 ax-12 2202 ax-13 2407 ax-ext 2750 ax-rep 4902 ax-sep 4912 ax-nul 4920 ax-pow 4971 ax-pr 5034 ax-un 7095 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-an 383 df-or 827 df-3an 1072 df-tru 1633 df-ex 1852 df-nf 1857 df-sb 2049 df-eu 2621 df-mo 2622 df-clab 2757 df-cleq 2763 df-clel 2766 df-nfc 2901 df-ne 2943 df-ral 3065 df-rex 3066 df-reu 3067 df-rab 3069 df-v 3351 df-sbc 3586 df-csb 3681 df-dif 3724 df-un 3726 df-in 3728 df-ss 3735 df-nul 4062 df-if 4224 df-pw 4297 df-sn 4315 df-pr 4317 df-op 4321 df-uni 4573 df-iun 4654 df-br 4785 df-opab 4845 df-mpt 4862 df-id 5157 df-xp 5255 df-rel 5256 df-cnv 5257 df-co 5258 df-dm 5259 df-rn 5260 df-res 5261 df-ima 5262 df-iota 5994 df-fun 6033 df-fn 6034 df-f 6035 df-f1 6036 df-fo 6037 df-f1o 6038 df-fv 6039 df-ov 6795 df-oprab 6796 df-mpt2 6797 df-1st 7314 df-2nd 7315 df-hof 17097 |
This theorem is referenced by: hof2 17104 hofcllem 17105 hofcl 17106 yonedalem3b 17126 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |