Theorem funfv2f 6426

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfv2 6425 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfv2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfv2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfv2f	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfv2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfv2 6425	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfv2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfv2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2916	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 4844	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1998	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 4801	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvab 2898	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 4594	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	syl6eq 2824	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1634  {cab 2760  Ⅎwnfc 2903  ∪ cuni 4585   class class class wbr 4797  Fun wfun 6036  ‘cfv 6042

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1873  ax-4 1888  ax-5 1994  ax-6 2060  ax-7 2096  ax-8 2150  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2206  ax-13 2411  ax-ext 2754  ax-sep 4928  ax-nul 4936  ax-pow 4988  ax-pr 5048

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 384  df-or 864  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1637  df-ex 1856  df-nf 1861  df-sb 2053  df-eu 2625  df-mo 2626  df-clab 2761  df-cleq 2767  df-clel 2770  df-nfc 2905  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3357  df-sbc 3594  df-dif 3732  df-un 3734  df-in 3736  df-ss 3743  df-nul 4074  df-if 4236  df-sn 4327  df-pr 4329  df-op 4333  df-uni 4586  df-br 4798  df-opab 4860  df-id 5171  df-xp 5269  df-rel 5270  df-cnv 5271  df-co 5272  df-dm 5273  df-rn 5274  df-res 5275  df-ima 5276  df-iota 6005  df-fun 6044  df-fn 6045  df-fv 6050

This theorem is referenced by: (None)