Theorem frss 5233

Description: Subset theorem for the well-founded predicate. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frss	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem frss

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sstr2 3751	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
2	1	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
3	2	anim1d 589	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅)))
4	3	imim1d 82	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
5	4	alimdv 1994	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
6		df-fr 5225	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
7		df-fr 5225	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	3imtr4g 285	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1630   ≠ wne 2932  ∀wral 3050  ∃wrex 3051   ⊆ wss 3715  ∅c0 4058   class class class wbr 4804   Fr wfr 5222

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1988  ax-6 2054  ax-7 2090  ax-9 2148  ax-10 2168  ax-11 2183  ax-12 2196  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2740

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1635  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2047  df-clab 2747  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2756  df-in 3722  df-ss 3729  df-fr 5225

This theorem is referenced by:  freq2  5237  wess  5253  frmin  32048  frrlem5  32090