Theorem frege65b 38730

Description: A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2712 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53.

In Frege care is taken to point out that the variables in the first clauses are independent of each other and of the final term so another valid translation could be : ⊢ (∀𝑥([𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) → (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑏]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑐]𝜒) → ([𝑧 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑐]𝜒))). But that is perhaps too pedantic a translation for this exploration. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege65b	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))

Proof of Theorem frege65b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbim 2542	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		frege64b 38729	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
3	1, 2	sylbi 207	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
4		frege61b 38726	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1629  [wsb 2049

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1870  ax-4 1885  ax-5 1991  ax-6 2057  ax-7 2093  ax-10 2174  ax-12 2203  ax-13 2408  ax-frege1 38610  ax-frege2 38611  ax-frege8 38629  ax-frege58b 38721

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-an 383  df-or 837  df-ex 1853  df-nf 1858  df-sb 2050

This theorem is referenced by:  frege66b  38731