fparlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > fparlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem fparlem1 7322

Description: Lemma for fpar 7326. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
fparlem1	⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Proof of Theorem fparlem1 Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvres 6245	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = (1^st ‘𝑦))
2	1	eqeq1d 2653	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
3		vex 3234	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	elsn2 4244	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ (1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥)
5		fvex 6239	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V
6	5	biantru 525	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
7	4, 6	bitr3i 266	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V))
8	2, 7	syl6bb 276	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) → (((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥 ↔ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
9	8	pm5.32i 670	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
10		f1stres 7234	. . . 4 ⊢ (1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V
11		ffn 6083	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)):(V × V)⟶V → (1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V))
12		fniniseg 6378	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1^st ↾ (V × V)) Fn (V × V) → (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥)))
13	10, 11, 12	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ↾ (V × V))‘𝑦) = 𝑥))
14		elxp7 7245	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑦) ∈ {𝑥} ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑦) ∈ V)))
15	9, 13, 14	3bitr4i 292	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ({𝑥} × V))
16	15	eqriv 2648	1 ⊢ (^◡(1^st ↾ (V × V)) “ {𝑥}) = ({𝑥} × V)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 383 = wceq 1523 ∈ wcel 2030 Vcvv 3231 {csn 4210 × cxp 5141 ^◡ccnv 5142 ↾ cres 5145 “ cima 5146 Fn wfn 5921 ⟶wf 5922 ‘cfv 5926 1^st c1st 7208 2^nd c2nd 7209

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1762 ax-4 1777 ax-5 1879 ax-6 1945 ax-7 1981 ax-8 2032 ax-9 2039 ax-10 2059 ax-11 2074 ax-12 2087 ax-13 2282 ax-ext 2631 ax-sep 4814 ax-nul 4822 ax-pow 4873 ax-pr 4936 ax-un 6991

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3an 1056 df-tru 1526 df-ex 1745 df-nf 1750 df-sb 1938 df-eu 2502 df-mo 2503 df-clab 2638 df-cleq 2644 df-clel 2647 df-nfc 2782 df-ne 2824 df-ral 2946 df-rex 2947 df-rab 2950 df-v 3233 df-sbc 3469 df-csb 3567 df-dif 3610 df-un 3612 df-in 3614 df-ss 3621 df-nul 3949 df-if 4120 df-sn 4211 df-pr 4213 df-op 4217 df-uni 4469 df-iun 4554 df-br 4686 df-opab 4746 df-mpt 4763 df-id 5053 df-xp 5149 df-rel 5150 df-cnv 5151 df-co 5152 df-dm 5153 df-rn 5154 df-res 5155 df-ima 5156 df-iota 5889 df-fun 5928 df-fn 5929 df-f 5930 df-fv 5934 df-1st 7210 df-2nd 7211

This theorem is referenced by: fparlem3 7324

W3C validator