Theorem ceqsalv 3373

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsalv.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
ceqsalv.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsalv	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem ceqsalv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1992	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		ceqsalv.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3		ceqsalv.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	1, 2, 3	ceqsal 3372	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196  ∀wal 1630   = wceq 1632   ∈ wcel 2139  Vcvv 3340

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1988  ax-6 2054  ax-7 2090  ax-9 2148  ax-12 2196  ax-ext 2740

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1074  df-tru 1635  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2047  df-clab 2747  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2756  df-v 3342

This theorem is referenced by:  ralxpxfr2d  3466  clel4  3482  frsn  5346  raliunxp  5417  fv3  6367  funimass4  6409  marypha2lem3  8508  kmlem12  9175  fpwwe2lem12  9655  vdwmc2  15885  itg2leub  23700  nmoubi  27936  choc0  28494  nmopub  29076  nmfnleub  29093  elintfv  31969  heibor1lem  33921  elmapintrab  38384