 Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ax-ac Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Axiom ax-ac 9465
 Description: Axiom of Choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is usually considered an extension of ZF set theory rather than a proper part of it. It is sometimes considered philosophically controversial because it asserts the existence of a set without telling us what the set is. ZF set theory that includes AC is called ZFC. The unpublished version given here says that given any set 𝑥, there exists a 𝑦 that is a collection of unordered pairs, one pair for each nonempty member of 𝑥. One entry in the pair is the member of 𝑥, and the other entry is some arbitrary member of that member of 𝑥. See the rewritten version ac3 9468 for a more detailed explanation. Theorem ac2 9467 shows an equivalent written compactly with restricted quantifiers. This version was specifically crafted to be short when expanded to primitives. Kurt Maes' 5-quantifier version ackm 9471 is slightly shorter when the biconditional of ax-ac 9465 is expanded into implication and negation. In axac3 9470 we allow the constant CHOICE to represent the Axiom of Choice; this simplifies the representation of theorems like gchac 9687 (the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice). Standard textbook versions of AC are derived as ac8 9498, ac5 9483, and ac7 9479. The Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 8654 (among others) is used to derive our version from the standard ones; this reverse derivation is shown as theorem dfac2b 9135. Equivalents to AC are the well-ordering theorem weth 9501 and Zorn's lemma zorn 9513. See ac4 9481 for comments about stronger versions of AC. In order to avoid uses of ax-reg 8654 for derivation of AC equivalents, we provide ax-ac2 9469 (due to Kurt Maes), which is equivalent to the standard AC of textbooks. The derivation of ax-ac2 9469 from ax-ac 9465 is shown by theorem axac2 9472, and the reverse derivation by axac 9473. Therefore, new proofs should normally use ax-ac2 9469 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-1996.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
ax-ac 𝑦𝑧𝑤((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑥) → ∃𝑣𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢,𝑡

Detailed syntax breakdown of Axiom ax-ac
StepHypRef Expression
1 vz . . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑧
2 vw . . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑤
31, 2wel 2132 . . . . . 6 wff 𝑧𝑤
4 vx . . . . . . 7 setvar 𝑥
52, 4wel 2132 . . . . . 6 wff 𝑤𝑥
63, 5wa 383 . . . . 5 wff (𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑥)
7 vu . . . . . . . . . . . 12 setvar 𝑢
87, 2wel 2132 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑢𝑤
9 vt . . . . . . . . . . . 12 setvar 𝑡
102, 9wel 2132 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑤𝑡
118, 10wa 383 . . . . . . . . . 10 wff (𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡)
127, 9wel 2132 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑢𝑡
13 vy . . . . . . . . . . . 12 setvar 𝑦
149, 13wel 2132 . . . . . . . . . . 11 wff 𝑡𝑦
1512, 14wa 383 . . . . . . . . . 10 wff (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)
1611, 15wa 383 . . . . . . . . 9 wff ((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦))
1716, 9wex 1845 . . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦))
18 vv . . . . . . . . 9 setvar 𝑣
197, 18weq 2032 . . . . . . . 8 wff 𝑢 = 𝑣
2017, 19wb 196 . . . . . . 7 wff (∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣)
2120, 7wal 1622 . . . . . 6 wff 𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣)
2221, 18wex 1845 . . . . 5 wff 𝑣𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣)
236, 22wi 4 . . . 4 wff ((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑥) → ∃𝑣𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
2423, 2wal 1622 . . 3 wff 𝑤((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑥) → ∃𝑣𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
2524, 1wal 1622 . 2 wff 𝑧𝑤((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑥) → ∃𝑣𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
2625, 13wex 1845 1 wff 𝑦𝑧𝑤((𝑧𝑤𝑤𝑥) → ∃𝑣𝑢(∃𝑡((𝑢𝑤𝑤𝑡) ∧ (𝑢𝑡𝑡𝑦)) ↔ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class This axiom is referenced by:  zfac  9466  ac2  9467
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator