|Metamath Proof Explorer||
|Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ax-13||Structured version Visualization version GIF version|
|Description: Axiom of Quantified
Equality. One of the equality and substitution axioms
of predicate calculus with equality.
An equivalent way to express this axiom that may be easier to understand is (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧))) (see ax13b 1913). Recall that in the intended interpretation, our variables are metavariables ranging over the variables of predicate calculus (the object language). In order for the first antecedent ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 to hold, 𝑥 and 𝑦 must have different values and thus cannot be the same object-language variable (so they are effectively "distinct variables" even though no $d is present). Similarly, 𝑥 and 𝑧 cannot be the same object-language variable. Therefore, 𝑥 will not occur in the wff 𝑦 = 𝑧 when the first two antecedents hold, so analogous to ax-5 1789, the conclusion (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧) follows. Note that ax-5 1789 cannot prove this directly because it requires $d statements.
The primary purpose of this axiom is to provide a way to introduce the quantifier ∀𝑥 on 𝑦 = 𝑧 even when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. In this case, the first antecedent becomes ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 and the axiom still holds.
Although this version is shorter, the original version axc9 2188 may be more practical to work with because of the "distinctor" form of its antecedents. A typical application of axc9 2188 is in dvelimh 2219 which converts a distinct variable pair to the distinctor antecedent ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦. In particular, it is conjectured that it is not possible to prove ax6 2142 from ax6v 1837 without this axiom.
This axiom can be weakened if desired by adding distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. To show that, we add these restrictions to theorem ax13v 2138 and use only ax13v 2138 for further derivations. Thus, ax13v 2138 should be the only theorem referencing this axiom. Other theorems can reference either ax13v 2138 (preferred) or ax13 2140.
This axiom scheme is logically redundant (see ax13w 1960) but is used as an auxiliary axiom scheme to achieve metalogical completeness (i.e. so that all possible cases of bundling can be proved; see text linked at mmtheorems.html#ax6dgen). It is not known whether this axiom can be derived from the others. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|ax-13||⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))|
|1||vx||. . . 4 setvar 𝑥|
|2||vy||. . . 4 setvar 𝑦|
|3||1, 2||weq 1822||. . 3 wff 𝑥 = 𝑦|
|4||3||wn 3||. 2 wff ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦|
|5||vz||. . . 4 setvar 𝑧|
|6||2, 5||weq 1822||. . 3 wff 𝑦 = 𝑧|
|7||6, 1||wal 1466||. . 3 wff ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧|
|8||6, 7||wi 4||. 2 wff (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)|
|9||4, 8||wi 4||1 wff (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))|
|Colors of variables: wff setvar class|
|This axiom is referenced by: ax13v 2138|
|Copyright terms: Public domain||W3C validator|