Theorem asclpropd 19569

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), one is an associative algebra iff the other one is. The last hypotheses on 1_r can be discharged either by letting 𝑊 = V (if strong equality is known on ·_𝑠) or assuming 𝐾 is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
asclpropd.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
asclpropd.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
asclpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
asclpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
asclpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
asclpropd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
asclpropd.5	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
asclpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝑥,𝑃,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem asclpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		asclpropd.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)
2		asclpropd.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	oveqrspc2v 6838	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
4	3	anassrs 683	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
5	1, 4	mpidan 707	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
6		asclpropd.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
7	6	oveq2d 6831	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
8	7	adantr 472	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
9	5, 8	eqtrd 2795	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
10	9	mpteq2dva 4897	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
11		asclpropd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
12	11	mpteq1d 4891	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))))
13		asclpropd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
14	13	mpteq1d 4891	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
15	10, 12, 14	3eqtr3d 2803	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
16		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐾)
17		asclpropd.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
19		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)
20		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐾)
21	16, 17, 18, 19, 20	asclfval 19557	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)))
22		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (algSc‘𝐿)
23		asclpropd.g	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
24		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
25		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)
26		eqid 2761	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐿) = (1r‘𝐿)
27	22, 23, 24, 25, 26	asclfval 19557	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
28	15, 21, 27	3eqtr4g 2820	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 383   = wceq 1632   ∈ wcel 2140   ↦ cmpt 4882  ‘cfv 6050  (class class class)co 6815  Basecbs 16080  Scalarcsca 16167   ·_𝑠 cvsca 16168  1_rcur 18722  algSccascl 19534

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1871  ax-4 1886  ax-5 1989  ax-6 2055  ax-7 2091  ax-8 2142  ax-9 2149  ax-10 2169  ax-11 2184  ax-12 2197  ax-13 2392  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 4924  ax-sep 4934  ax-nul 4942  ax-pow 4993  ax-pr 5056

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1074  df-tru 1635  df-ex 1854  df-nf 1859  df-sb 2048  df-eu 2612  df-mo 2613  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2757  df-nfc 2892  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3057  df-reu 3058  df-rab 3060  df-v 3343  df-sbc 3578  df-csb 3676  df-dif 3719  df-un 3721  df-in 3723  df-ss 3730  df-nul 4060  df-if 4232  df-sn 4323  df-pr 4325  df-op 4329  df-uni 4590  df-iun 4675  df-br 4806  df-opab 4866  df-mpt 4883  df-id 5175  df-xp 5273  df-rel 5274  df-cnv 5275  df-co 5276  df-dm 5277  df-rn 5278  df-res 5279  df-ima 5280  df-iota 6013  df-fun 6052  df-fn 6053  df-f 6054  df-f1 6055  df-fo 6056  df-f1o 6057  df-fv 6058  df-ov 6818  df-slot 16084  df-base 16086  df-ascl 19537

This theorem is referenced by:  ply1ascl  19851