Theorem alexeqg 3363

Description: Two ways to express substitution of 𝐴 for 𝑥 in 𝜑. This is the analogue for classes of sb56 2188. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Apr-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alexeqg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem alexeqg

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2662	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
2	1	anbi1d 741	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	exbidv 1890	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
4	1	imbi1d 330	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
5	4	albidv 1889	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
6		sb56 2188	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
7	3, 5, 6	vtoclbg 3298	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
8	7	bicomd 213	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1521   = wceq 1523  ∃wex 1744   ∈ wcel 2030

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1762  ax-4 1777  ax-5 1879  ax-6 1945  ax-7 1981  ax-9 2039  ax-10 2059  ax-12 2087  ax-ext 2631

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-tru 1526  df-ex 1745  df-nf 1750  df-sb 1938  df-clab 2638  df-cleq 2644  df-clel 2647  df-v 3233

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqex  3364  sbc6g  3494